Minority interest, probably. No direct relevance to ME/CFS "Weighing Up Anonymity and Openness in Publication Peer Review" (May 13) by Hilda Bastian http://blogs.plos.org/absolutely-ma...mity-and-openness-in-publication-peer-review/ Like a mini-review paper where she looks at the data from studies and trials. At one point, she mentions "Science has a status bias problem" (i.e. higher status researchers are treated better by peer review). Quite a long article. Not the most exciting thing I've read and the evidence isn't clear cut for a lot of it but maybe of interest to somebody.