Minority interest, probably. No direct relevance to ME/CFS
"Weighing Up Anonymity and Openness in Publication Peer Review"
(May 13)
by Hilda Bastian
http://blogs.plos.org/absolutely-ma...mity-and-openness-in-publication-peer-review/
Like a mini-review paper where she looks at the data from studies and trials.
At one point, she mentions "Science has a status bias problem" (i.e. higher status researchers are treated better by peer review).
Quite a long article. Not the most exciting thing I've read and the evidence isn't clear cut for a lot of it but maybe of interest to somebody.
"Weighing Up Anonymity and Openness in Publication Peer Review"
(May 13)
by Hilda Bastian
http://blogs.plos.org/absolutely-ma...mity-and-openness-in-publication-peer-review/
Like a mini-review paper where she looks at the data from studies and trials.
At one point, she mentions "Science has a status bias problem" (i.e. higher status researchers are treated better by peer review).
Quite a long article. Not the most exciting thing I've read and the evidence isn't clear cut for a lot of it but maybe of interest to somebody.
