1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
August 8th - What is the one thing about suffering with severe ME that the world needs to know?
Andrew Gladman brings our coverage of the Understanding & Remembrance Day for Severe ME, airing the voice of patients ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Understanding Long-Term Outcomes of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Discussion in 'Latest ME/CFS Research' started by Dolphin, Jun 30, 2012.

  1. user9876

    user9876 Senior Member

    Messages:
    794
    Likes:
    1,950
    You mean that death cann't be cured with a dose of CBT and GET to convince you to think you are alive!
     
    xchocoholic likes this.
  2. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,870
    Likes:
    6,160

    As I mentioned before on the odd other thread, one way around this is to have graduations:



    From






     
  3. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,870
    Likes:
    6,160
    Something just reminded me that Maureen Hanson got a NIH grant to study these patients. The main focus was MLVs. However, she did say she would do other testing
    e.g.
    see:
    https://listserv.nodak.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind1006E&L=CO-CURE&P=R901&I=-3
     
  4. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,870
    Likes:
    6,160
    Somebody drew my attention to this study:
    (they were aware of it from this page:
    http://users.chariot.net.au/~posture/Da Costa'sSyndWikiwebpagel.html#anchor1102088 )
    I found the full text is available free here:
    http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=289775 (click on pdf).
     
    Snow Leopard likes this.
  5. jimells

    jimells Senior Member

    Messages:
    536
    Likes:
    903
    northern Maine
    My overall impression from reading this thread is that the research paper is only useful to the extent it stimulates more research funding. Am I correct in assuming that this is a dirty little secret of the research 'community', i.e., everyone knows most published research is rubbish, and the purpose is to generate more grants?

    Seems to me there is something very, very wrong with this...
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page