1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
The Pathway to Prevention (P2P) for ME/CFS: A Dangerous Process
Gabby Klein gives an overview of the P2P process, shedding light on the pitfalls with advice as to what we can do in protest ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Treatment outcome in adults with CFS: a prospectiv​e study in England based on the CFS/ME NOD

Discussion in 'Latest ME/CFS Research' started by Dolphin, Mar 30, 2013.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,808
    Likes:
    5,894
    Call me cynical but I wonder whether perhaps they posted a correction note because it allowed them claim better results. I quite often point out errors to authors but only rarely are corrections published.
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2014
    Valentijn, Bob, Sean and 1 other person like this.
  2. Bob

    Bob

    Messages:
    8,522
    Likes:
    11,364
    South of England
    Indeed. I don't recall other authors or journals publishing corrections so freely, even when blatant errors are highlighted by the public.
     
  3. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,294
    Likes:
    5,600
    A little OT, but I just stumbled upon this thread and it reminded me of White and Barts saying that these results (though not the paper) showed that their service gained the best results in the UK. How bad must some of the other GET centres have been then? If they're able to use claims about being the best to promote themselves, patients should also be allowed to know which services were the worst, by these standards.
     
    Dolphin, Simon, Min and 1 other person like this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page