1. Patients launch a $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
ME/CFS and the Magic of the Canine Factor
There's been plenty of research indicating that having pets is good for your health. I never really noticed any particular benefits to having cats, though that may have had more to do with my cats. They've been fairly indifferent to my presence and we've shared a live-and-let-live...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Training General Practitioners in the Treatment of Functional Somatic Symptoms...

Discussion in 'Latest ME/CFS Research' started by Esther12, Jul 31, 2010.

  1. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,089
    Likes:
    4,860
    I can't get over how happily they spin their results:

    http://content.karger.com/ProdukteD...howAbstract&ArtikelNr=313691&ProduktNr=223864

    Background: Patients with medically unexplained or functional somatic symptoms (FSS) are prevalent in primary care. In this pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial we aimed to test the effect of a training programme (The Extended Reattribution and Management model) for general practitioners (GPs) in the treatment of FSS. Methods: 38 participating GPs were randomised to the control group or the training group. The GPs included consecutive 18- to 65-year-old patients presenting during a 3-week period for new health complaints. We assessed a stratified subsample with the psychiatric interview Schedules of Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. Of 701 patients interviewed, 350 fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for any ICD-10 somatoform disorder (SD) and 111 presented FSS without fulfilling these criteria (sub-threshold SD). Patients completed questionnaires at baseline and after 3, 12 and 24 months. The questionnaires included assessment of health status (36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form; SF-36), health anxiety (Whiteley-7) and physical symptoms (Symptom Check List-90, somatization subscale). Results: Patients with SD consulting trained GPs improved more on our primary outcome of physical functioning than patients consulting control GPs at the 3-month follow-up (p = 0.004), but the improvement was not statistically significant at later follow-up. We found no significant differences in improvement between patients with SD and those with sub-threshold SD. Results for other SF-36 subscales, physical symptoms and health anxiety only showed statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups for patients with SD; patients consulting trained GPs had less improvement in vitality, health anxiety and physical symptoms at 24 months compared with the control group. Conclusions: GP training may accelerate improvement in physical functioning for patients with SD. However, the effect is small and may not be clinically significant.
  2. paddygirl

    paddygirl Senior Member

    Messages:
    163
    Likes:
    20
    Are they saying that half those patients had SD? The arrogance of it. I wonder did it occur to them that the reason there was not much improvement in the group was that these people had genuine problems.
  3. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,440
    Likes:
    4,668
    Firstly, the full text is available for free at that link if anyone is interested.

    Good point. I know Fink is a "hardliner".

    Vol. 79, No. 4, 2010
    Regular Article

  4. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,440
    Likes:
    4,668
    There was also an unsuccessful trial of re-attribution training in the UK

    This used to be listed on the CFS/ME page of the Medical Research Council (MRC) in the UK as I recall.

    Full free text at: http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/full/191/6/536

  5. Sean

    Sean Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,152
    Likes:
    1,663
    How the hell did that get through peer review? By any fair standard it should have read something like:

    Conclusions: Active intervention in the form of GP training produced a worse outcome than in the untreated control arm. The implications of this need further investigation.

    Preferably by researchers with no vested interest in the outcome.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page