1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
The Pathway to Prevention (P2P) for ME/CFS: A Dangerous Process
Gabby Klein gives an overview of the P2P process, shedding light on the pitfalls with advice as to what we can do in protest ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

The Psychologist on International Consensus Criteria

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS News' started by Jenny, Aug 25, 2011.

  1. Jenny

    Jenny Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,233
    Likes:
    200
    London
    Chronic consensus or controversy?

    Experts from five continents have agreed upon on a new set of International Consensus Criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME; also referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome or CFS), which they hope will improve clinical diagnosis and research into the condition.

    Writing in the Journal of Internal Medicine in July (tinyurl.com/44tvs6v), the 25 co-authors said: The primary goal of this consensus report is to establish a more selective set of clinical criteria that would identify patients who have neuroimmune exhaustion with a pathological low-threshold of fatigability and symptom flare in response to exertion. This will enable like patients to be diagnosed and enrolled in research studies internationally under a case definition that is acceptable to physicians and researchers around the world.

    The new criteria are the latest in a series of attempts to nail down the hallmarks of ME/CFS. For example, last year saw a revision to narrow down the Canadian Case Definition, originally published in 2003, which has proved popular with many researchers. Bruce Carruthers, a psychiatrist in private practice in Vancouver, who was lead author on those 2003 criteria is also co-editor of the new International Consensus Criteria.

    A key departure from its forerunners by the new International Criteria is that symptoms and signs need not have been present for six months before a diagnosis can be made. No other disease criteria require that diagnoses be withheld until after the patient has suffered with the affliction for six months, the authors said.

    However, the cardinal symptom remains Post-Exertional Neuroimmune Exhaustion a profound loss of energy following exertion, and impaired recovery. Also, the patient must have at least one symptom in each of the following categories: neurocognitive impairments (e.g. pain); immune, gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary impairments (e.g. food sensitivities); and energy production/ transportation impairments (e.g. laboured breathing).

    The new criteria also urge that the CFS label be dropped. Using fatigue as a name of a disease gives it exclusive emphasis and has been the most confusing and misused criterion, argue Carruthers and his colleagues. Fatigue in other conditions is usually proportional to effort or duration with a quick recovery, and will recur to the same extent with the same effort or duration that same or next day. The pathological low threshold of fatigability of ME described in the following criteria often occurs with minimal physical or mental exertion, and with reduced ability to undertake the same activity within the same or several days.

    Publication of the new diagnostic criteria coincided with reports by the BBC and elsewhere of a hate campaign being waged against scientists investigating the psychology of ME/CFS (tinyurl.com/43gdktg). Psychiatrist Simon Wessely at the Institute of Psychiatry said hed been the target of intimidating letters, e-mails and phone calls. Sadly some of the motivation seems to come from people who believe that any connection with psychiatry is tantamount to saying there is nothing wrong with you, go away, youre not really ill, he told the BBC.

    Chartered psychologist and BPS fellow Dr Ellen Goudsmit has ME and researches the condition. She had first-hand experience of the animosity that often confronts scientists working in the field including two complaints made about her to the BPS and a court case, which she won. But she says its not just a reaction against a psychological interpretation of the illness. All those who have harassed and threatened me during the past ten years have known that I was a patient and were well aware of my criticisms of psychiatric theories about ME, she says. However, patients had become increasingly angry at the way the medical world had trivialised the illness and hyped the benefits of psychiatric interventions like CBT, she explained, and that created a fertile ground for conspiracy theories and abusive e-mails.

    Goudsmit herself became a target after challenging factual errors in posts on the internet. Those responsible are a small group, most dont have ME themselves, but theyve alienated a lot of experienced experts who didnt want to risk being in the firing line and retired. In my view, the real victims of the conspiracy theorists have been people with ME.

    Christian Jarrett
    ....................................................................................................................................................................
    Jenny
     
    wdb likes this.
  2. Sasha

    Sasha Fine, thank you

    Messages:
    8,805
    Likes:
    8,254
    UK
    Thanks, Jenny - I'm pleased that The Psychologist has reported on the ICC - a big thing for us in itself - and pleased by Ellen Goudsmit's reply about the trivialisation of our illness and the hyping of CBT.

    Finally, some positive coverage in the media during what have been some horrible weeks of what has seemed to me a campaign of hate against patients.
     
  3. Battery Muncher

    Battery Muncher Senior Member

    Messages:
    228
    Likes:
    256
    Yep, well said Sasha.
     
  4. Tristen

    Tristen Senior Member

    Messages:
    613
    Likes:
    425
    Northern Ca. USA
    Yes, good to see this
     
  5. Wonko

    Wonko Senior Member

    Messages:
    627
    Likes:
    104
    England
    Quite apart from the issue that as ME has been treated as a "we dont know whats wrong with you but it's probably mental" label for any patients that dont have physcially missing bits or large pools of blood in the vacinity, it's very likely, due to this daignostic policy, that there is the "odd" ME/CFS patient who may in fact simply be a little tiny bit raving loony, according to the Wessley school of thought everyone with ME has CFS and CFS is a mental health condition - so in effect he's complaining that some people with mental health issues may make "irrational" statements/threats and dont respect his position/authority.

    And this guy is supposed to be a qualified psych?
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page