1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
Phoenix Rising Adds Two New Board Members
Mark Berry introduces the new President of Phoenix Rising, Dr. Gary Solomon, and welcomes Professor Jonathan Edwards to the Phoenix Rising Board of Directors.
Discuss the article on the Forums.

The prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome/ myalgic encephalomyelitis: a meta-analysis

Discussion in 'Latest ME/CFS Research' started by snowathlete, Mar 28, 2013.

  1. snowathlete

    snowathlete

    Messages:
    2,245
    Likes:
    2,789
    UK
    Don't think this has been posted yet. From Marshall et al in Australia.

    http://www.dovepress.com/the-preval...ncephalomyelitis-a-peer-reviewed-article-CLEP

    26 March 2013.

    Samantha Johnston,1 Ekua W Brenu,1 Donald Staines,1,2 Sonya Marshall-Gradisnik1
    1Griffith Health Institute, School of Medical Sciences, National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases, Griffith University, Parklands, QLD, Australia; 2Gold Coast Public Health Unit, Queensland Health, Robina, QLD, Australia

    Purpose: To perform a meta-analysis to examine variability among prevalence estimates for CFS/ME, according to the method of assessment used.
    Methods: Databases were systematically searched for studies on CFS/ME prevalence in adults that applied the 1994 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) case definition.1 Estimates were categorized into two methods of assessment: self-reporting of symptoms versus clinical assessment of symptoms. Meta-analysis was performed to pool prevalences by assessment using random effects modeling. This was stratified by sample setting (community or primary care) and heterogeneity was examined using the I2 statistic.
    Results: Of 216 records found, 14 studies were considered suitable for inclusion. The pooled prevalence for self-reporting assessment was 3.28% (95% CI: 2.24–4.33) and 0.76% (95% CI: 0.23–1.29) for clinical assessment. High variability was observed among self-reported estimates, while clinically assessed estimates showed greater consistency.
    Conclusion: The observed heterogeneity in CFS/ME prevalence may be due to differences in method of assessment. Stakeholders should be cautious of prevalence determined by the self-reporting of symptoms alone. The 1994 CDC case definition appeared to be the most reliable clinical assessment tool available at the time of these studies. Improving clinical case definitions and their adoption internationally will enable better comparisons of findings and inform health systems about the true burden of CFS/ME.
     
    WillowJ, Simon and Sean like this.
  2. WillowJ

    WillowJ Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,144
    Likes:
    2,841
    WA, USA
    It would be good to know the details of 'heterogeneity' and 'clinical assessment' but it looks like one would need to read the other studies to get the latter.

    ETA: then again, maybe they mean this:

     
    Simon likes this.
  3. Sean

    Sean Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,315
    Likes:
    2,380
    Donald Staines

    I think this fellow is worth keeping an eye on (in a good way). :)
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page