Julie Rehmeyer's 'Through the Shadowlands'
Writer Never Give Up talks about Julie Rehmeyer's new book "Through the Shadowlands: A Science Writer's Odyssey into an Illness Science Doesn't Understand" and shares an interview with Julie ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

The name and Peter White's vision of care in the future i.e. fatigue clinics

Discussion in 'Institute of Medicine (IOM) Government Contract' started by Tom Kindlon, Mar 16, 2015.

  1. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes:
    8,111
    Wasn't sure which forum to post it in. But it's about the name issue so I've posted it here.

    Peter White's vision for care for the future:


    http://www.eapm.eu.com/tl_files/content/eaclpp/Working%20Groups/EACLPP_WG_Medically_Unexplained_Symptoms_Budapest_2011.pdf
    -----------------

    One can easily see that there could be generic fatigue clinics the way there are generic pain clinics.

    The fatigue in other conditions is much more likely to respond to exercise. It is easy to see the sorts of clinics there would be.

    Remaining with the name "chronic fatigue syndrome" facilitates this.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2015
    Cheshire, Valentijn, WillowJ and 2 others like this.
  2. halcyon

    halcyon Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,254
    Likes:
    5,278
    Mr. White made it pretty clear in his recent Medscape article that he's not impressed with the new name at all.

    If he has his way, it will be business as usual in the UK for the foreseeable future. The disease will remain CFS, and the treatments will be CBT and GET.
     
  3. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes:
    8,111
    Yes, keeping CFS maintains the status quo with CBT and GET as evidence-based treatments for the condition, etc.
     
  4. worldbackwards

    worldbackwards A unique snowflake

    Messages:
    2,091
    Likes:
    10,354
    Earth
    Classic White - muddy the waters as far as possible and you won't know what works or not for which patients.

    I admire his guile. I still think he's a shit though.
     
  5. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,264
    Likes:
    33,685
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    Something I am wondering about is whether we should ever use "evidence based" without the scare quotes. Its not really evidence based, its just claimed to be evidence based because they met simplistic tickbox criteria without adequately establishing a scientific basis for their claim. When "evidence based" is cited they often add the words "Gold standard", implying its the highest standard of evidence.

    When I look at the results, can I say PACE (for example) is the highest standard of evidence? No. It had the potential but they failed to meet it. Was it double blinded? No. Did it have adequate controls? No. So under evidence based methodologies the study might be due to a downgrade in evidence quality. Were there objective measures likely to be minimally influenced by bias etc.? Yes, but improperly and inadequately employed. Did the objective evidence validate claims? No. Were the response rates and effect sizes large enough to be a clear response? No. Were there any other issues that might invalidate or bias the study. Lots and lots and lots.

    I would downgrade PACE not one but two levels of evidence, and am considering a full downgrade to no better than anecdotal. Further some of the issues are so grievous that I wonder if a call should be made to retract all of this research.

    Where is the economic analysis of outcomes in financial terms? How do we know these clinics are even worth the money? These are pie in the sky promises that are never delivered from what I can see so far. If not, why don't they produce a definitive study? How many patients improve enough for full time work and a good quality of life, stratified by illness severity? Where is the analysis of the benefit to society versus the cost of treatment? Serious economic analysis should be mandatory. Let me be clear and say this is about the clinics, and CBT/GET in the real world, not just a study.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2015
    SOC, Snowdrop, meadowlark and 7 others like this.
  6. halcyon

    halcyon Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,254
    Likes:
    5,278
    Even if it was all those things, wouldn't it still require independent verification? It's amusing that the psychs comment on every organic finding that comes out saying "that's nice, but the finding will need replication" yet for some reason the same standard didn't apply to the PACE trial. And based on that single unverified study, they prescribe CBT and GET treatment widely? Yeesh.
     
    John Mac, Cheshire, Valentijn and 2 others like this.
  7. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes:
    8,111
    There was this paper on the PACE Trial:

    that reported GET and CBT were cost-effective (largely by pricing care at the average wage per hour rather than a lower amount)
     
  8. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes:
    8,111
    There are lots of GET and particularly CBT studies that have found benefit (of a sort). So they can say there are replications. While pretty much any other treatment doesn't have two positive RCTs behind it.
     
    Valentijn and alex3619 like this.
  9. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,264
    Likes:
    33,685
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    Yes, but they did not do any proper economic analysis, and NOT on clinics. It was an inadequate analysis quite aside from the flaws you mentioned. When the Belgian government ran a review they found the clinics to be ineffective. I strongly suspect this would be the same everywhere.

    Furthermore they used the same flawed measures used in PACE. As I have commented, I think this research probably needs to be retracted. So any further results or papers from such poor research is not relevant, or can at least be considered low quality evidence.

    In any case the clinics are not studies. This is real world application. There is no substantive evidence other than claims that these clinics work. They need to be investigated. The reason I mention economic issues is because a large part of the argument for CBT/GET is based on cost savings. Let them prove such savings eventuate.

    No CBT/GET clinic for CFS that has been investigated has been shown to be effective. They should publish their data. They might not even be collecting adequate data to determine effectiveness. In which case it requires independent review.
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2015
  10. WillowJ

    WillowJ คภภเє ɠรค๓թєl

    Messages:
    3,763
    Likes:
    4,842
    WA, USA
    right, CBT and GET have been repeated a lot. PACE and FINE were the biggest trials. Most of the trials show that they can get patients to change answers on surveys about how they feel their fatigue is (after being repeatedly told symptoms are not important),

    but can't show any actually useful difference in how the patient is able to do more things (work, shop, make food, go hiking, etc.) or not needing as much medical treatment. This includes ICF patients. Regardless of what patient is being studied, no one can demonstrate that CBT/GET a' la pace is working for anyone.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2015
    Sidereal and Valentijn like this.
  11. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,264
    Likes:
    33,685
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    They would reply there are lots of studies, and PACE was simply the best. The real issue is a lack of objective outcomes in most of these studies. There is little doubt now there is very little if any improvement in fitness. There are no objective outcome measures that show a good response, and where such measures are used CBT/GET typically fails. The claims are nearly all based on subjective evidence and in conflict with the objective evidence where such evidence exists.
     
  12. Aidan Walsh

    Aidan Walsh

    Messages:
    89
    Likes:
    15
    He is one lost cannon if someone came out tomorrow with replicated cause(s) he would deny it completely all the
    CGT/GET was based on fraud from day one...If there is no infection then why did the UK Govt. take all the documents

    & file them under a secret acts law for National Security??? Something does not add up that's why I plan to sue from
    the Private sides of laws Commercial Liens forthcoming including SIMON/PETER,CDC/NIH/FDA including G-

    Countries...Watch how I am going to change things for everyone now...It will cost all of them 100's of Millions hopefully it will go into the Billions once I am finished filing these documents I will Arrest them all in Commerce...The

    CDC/NIH/FDA in Commerce Laws are actually 'persons' so is IBM, AIR CANADA, MICROSOFT, SIMON/PETER :)
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2015
  13. Sean

    Sean Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,185
    Likes:
    17,329
    Nice work if you can get it, writing the critique of your own show.
     
  14. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,264
    Likes:
    33,685
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    I regard that as a conflict of interest.
     
    SOC, Aidan Walsh, Valentijn and 4 others like this.
  15. msf

    msf Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,150
    Likes:
    4,341
    Peter White is a corporate shill.
     
  16. Aidan Walsh

    Aidan Walsh

    Messages:
    89
    Likes:
    15
    Watch how I now sue him Peter White including that other Weasle Simon I am coming for house cars savings bonds stocks I will leave both of them penniless...As soon as I file the documents a certified Copy will also go to all Major

    Banks including the London Stock Exchange which will put an immediate Lien on any accounts...I have had as much as I am going to take from these 2 fraud artists even the British Government gets attached to the Lien afterall all they

    are 'all' registered Corporations in Commerce...I do not use the Police or any Complaints Commissions I use solely Commerce to sue for damages...Once 90 days passes it becomes a Monetary Bond any Bank will buy it right out that

    same day...They will not have a pot to piss in once I am done with these 2 Hoods...I will have the last laugh & I will then publish online the entire document as soon as it is sold...Their houses are now my future investments portfolios...I'm

    coming for everything...So Help me God I have learned from the best in the business in Commerce thanks so very much Winston Shrout you opened my eyes fully to the Commerce fraud upon us all you are a Champion of the people... www.wssic.com bless you Sir :)'s
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2015
  17. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Hibernating

    Messages:
    4,577
    Likes:
    12,155
    South Australia
    Just letting you guys know that this is a public forum and it is possible that said fellows may come across this thread at some point, so don't get too carried away.
     
  18. Snowdrop

    Snowdrop Rebel without a biscuit

    Messages:
    2,803
    Likes:
    9,208
    Toronto
    Good thought. Though in that case I'd like to suggest that if they are going to insist on serving up CBT/GET that they also offer up some entertainment. I was thinking along the lines of balloons, clowns, jugglers, a knife thrower perhaps. :angel:
     
    Cheshire and Aidan Walsh like this.
  19. redviper

    redviper Senior Member

    Messages:
    145
    Likes:
    264
    Could care less if that clown Peter White or any of his like minded associates stumble across this thread. The blood of thousands of innocent people is on their hands as well as the untold amount of suffering that they have caused ME patients across the world. You want to make your career off preying off the sick and marginalized? You get what you deserve.
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2015
    Aidan Walsh likes this.
  20. Aidan Walsh

    Aidan Walsh

    Messages:
    89
    Likes:
    15
    If they are having balloons, clowns, jugglers, knife throwers count me in for some CBT 'Kok balls torture' Comedy at its best maybe Chernobyl they could work afterall isn't this radiation sickness CFS
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page