1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
Ergonomics and ME/CFS: Have You Hurt Yourself Without Knowing It?
Having a chronic illness like ME/CFS can make it hard to avoid problems that come from bad ergonomics. Jody Smith has learned some lessons the hard way ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

The Fight is on...Imperial College XMRV Study

Discussion in 'XMRV Research and Replication Studies' started by George, Jan 5, 2010.

  1. Dr. Yes

    Dr. Yes Shame on You

    Messages:
    867
    Likes:
    22
    I would like to add that this..

    ..is a shockingly unscientific statement. And I've seen a lot of doozies over the years. But at such an early stage of research into a new area with uncertainty about cohort selection, epidemiology, and testing protocols, with the knowledge that multiple studies are underway internationally, this is about as unscientific and politically dangerous a statement as a researcher could make -- to the BBC no less! Why would they risk it? I can't figure it out...
  2. Koan

    Koan Be the change.

    Messages:
    2,598
    Likes:
    55
    :eek:What DrYes said!
  3. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,265
    Likes:
    5,455
    "Etiological theories for CFS abound but none are established. Some of these theories are clinically unhelpful whatever their scientific merits. Thus, the belief that symptoms are due to a persistent viral infection of muscle may or may not be true but more importantly is clinically unhelpful."

    I'm not sure this is someone I'd trust to run a study to see if I have a persistant viral infection of muscle.

    (I've got to admit though, I've not read the full paper that someone here quoted this from yet - if anyone has a copy I'd love to see it.)

    Even if Wesseley was using the loosest definition of CFS, you'd expect some patients to be suffering from XMRV. Even with a healthy study group you expect a couple. Looks like we're in for a long wait on this.
  4. George

    George Guest

    Dr. Mikovits Talk

    Is it still open for questions for Dr. Mikovits talk on the 22nd? I'm sure she'll address the finding anyway so it's probably no big. Now this is just a rumor from a friend at my local doctors office and could be B.S. but she said the CDC results are in and held up by HHS but would be released around the 12th (for some reason) I had kinda wondered if that's why Dr. Mikovits scheduled her talk for the 22nd. Ya know give time for a few of the preliminary studies to come in and then answer questions.

    Seems like there were several studies going on that we didn't know about.:sofa: (my favorite smilie)
  5. joyscobby

    joyscobby Senior Member

    Messages:
    154
    Likes:
    0
    Will have to wait and see when published but unless they tested people from Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales they cannot say XMRV cannot be found in UK. Health policy is disolved in Scotland and is not part of the UK government or NICE. If no samples outwith England then cannot make claims for the whole of the UK.
  6. George

    George Guest

    Such a clever Kitty

    Very nice point. Can't wait to see the actual paper. Be the first thing I do in the morning, go paper hunting. (grins)
  7. George

    George Guest

    ROFLMT(tail)O, snort

    Nice one Levi! The McClure/Mikovits smack down in 2010. . . Think we can send her back to studying Foamy cells??? Seriously she has some major creds.
  8. Koan

    Koan Be the change.

    Messages:
    2,598
    Likes:
    55
    Good question.
  9. George

    George Guest

    Yeah My moneys on Dr. Mikovits

    I just can't figure out why someone with her (McClure) creds would get involved in this. Let's say you get 6 of 12 studies that come back more in favor of XMRV that would put a real crimp in this ladies Vita.
  10. Dr. Yes

    Dr. Yes Shame on You

    Messages:
    867
    Likes:
    22
    I had expected Wessely to lay low at least until he saw which way the wind was blowing on the XMRV replication studies later this year. I did not expect him to try to personally re-direct the wind!

    A bit of pure speculation on Wessely's motivations here..

    I'm not sure I see the strategy behind this new maneuvering, as he can't prevent the ongoing XMRV studies from going through, and will look like an ass if they find XMRV...

    However, an early "pre-emptive" study may be useful to him as it would give a basis to discourage further funding in the UK into XMRV research, which would at least allow him a degree of continuing influence within the UK. Even in this strategy, of course, he would be hoping that there is limited confirmation of the WPI findings or at least that it takes time.
  11. anne

    anne Guest

    This is the perfect chance for the UK organizations to expose the unscience behind the science. They have ammo now. But do they have guns and do they know how to load them? (As opposed to the response of our advocacy group to XMRV and Reeves' comments in the Times, which was to lock the ammo in a box and hide it in the back of the closet lest someone get hurt....)
  12. Dr. Yes

    Dr. Yes Shame on You

    Messages:
    867
    Likes:
    22
    I know... but what is more baffling is her brazenly unscientific declaration to the BBC. She stands a lot more to lose professionally from a screw-up in this field than Wessely (a psychiatrist, who can always blame her) does.
  13. hvs

    hvs Senior Member

    Messages:
    292
    Likes:
    0
    Hilarious.
  14. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,265
    Likes:
    5,455
  15. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,265
    Likes:
    5,455
    I don't understand the science of the PCR stuff. The way the patients were selected looks okay to me (if likely to be different to the WPI study). It sounds like they're implying the WPI result could have been thrown by possible contamination.

    It seems to me that the tests for XMRV are not as solid as some seem to say. The variable prostate studies might indicate this too.

    Wait and see imo.

    This bit made me laugh, just because of how they phrased it:

    "Patients in our CFS cohort had undergone medical screening to exclude detectable organic illness and met the CDC criteria for CFS."


    Of thsoe patients screened to make sure they were not suffering from a viral infection, no viral infection was found.
  16. hvs

    hvs Senior Member

    Messages:
    292
    Likes:
    0
    Wow: Wessley seemed to provide/define the patients [see the very bottom of the page]:
  17. outofstep

    outofstep

    Messages:
    27
    Likes:
    7
    they didn't use Canadian definition

    only Fukuda. So they're not replicating the WPI study-they're not using the same patient population.
  18. hvs

    hvs Senior Member

    Messages:
    292
    Likes:
    0
    By definition this undermines the study. Are they saying that no one had EBV?? What if XMRV needs a herpes virus to act??
  19. fresh_eyes

    fresh_eyes happy to be here

    Messages:
    900
    Likes:
    5
    mountains of north carolina
    Yes, hvs. Wessely is listed as having *personally* defined the cohort. Come on, CAA. Step up.
  20. George

    George Guest

    big missing piece???

    O.K. I'm going to read through this again but. . .

    Normally wouldn't you:

    1. Test a set of samples that you knew were positive to make sure your PCR was set up correctly?
    2. Get a copy of the RNA (virus) that you were looking for to make sure you were getting the correct virus particles?
    3. Test both known CFS/ME and healthy controls?
    Notice to that this study was submitted on December 1st?????

    Only one positive control??

    Does anyone get the impression in the "Discussion" section that they are sneering at WPI/NCI/CC??

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page