Discussion in 'General Symptoms' started by BadBadBear, Aug 22, 2014.
I think famvir should be put in the drinking water for us??
This is exactly what I started to think when I was on a high dose of Famvir for 9 months, I noticed the disappearance of some internal symptoms.
@heapsreal I have some expired (Feb '14) leftover Famvir, what shall I do with it? Do you think it's still good?
@zzz I'm intrigued by the Zantac antiviral activity.
Is it anecdotal or are there any clinical studies?
I'd love to learn more about it.
@heapsreal and @zzz Thanks for all the helpful info! I don't seem to have the symptoms of internal shingles and am wondering if the positive IgM was a cross reaction with the EBV like you mentioned? I am not sure what kind of test was run for the VZV and would have to dig out all my material. Since Famvir would treat the VZV, too, then I am okay in either scenario!
I've had chicken pox twice. I had measles twice too. I think it does indicate an immune system with some problems even as a child.
The one class of drugs that you really have to worry about in terms of expiration dates is the tetracycline antibiotics. Specifically, doxycycline turns toxic after it expires.
For just about everything else, the only thing that happens to expired drugs is that they slowly lose their potency after time. But this process is very slow, and there's nothing magic about the expiration date; taking the medicine the day after this date is no different from taking it the day before, as you would expect.
What the expiration date means is that the drug manufacturer has tested the drug for potency for a specific shelf life, and that shelf life is reflected in the expiration date. Obviously, the drug company saves money if it doesn't have to test for longer shelf lives. And in fact, if people throw out expired drugs and buy new ones, it's actually more profitable for the drug companies to keep the expiration dates as short as possible. Doesn't it seem a bit strange that absolutely all drugs expire within a couple of years or so?
A number of years ago, the Wall Street Journal did an investigation of this issue. It found that the vast majority of drugs were perfectly good after many times their advertised shelf life had passed. Some of these drugs had a very slight loss in potency, but nothing that would affect their clinical use. It concluded that expiration dates were set the way they were mainly for the benefit of the drug companies.
As a rule of thumb, if the exact dose of a medication isn't important, such as for a painkiller, then it's OK to keep them for many years, as the WSJ found. For example, I have kept some opiates for over ten years, and found no detectable difference in their potency from fresh ones. I recently did an experiment with some Isordil, which is like nitroglycerin except longer acting, and which you would expect to be quite volatile, and therefore useless after a few years. Nitroglycerin-type drugs are known to be very effective against CFS in many people, and I am one of them. One recent morning, I was having a lot of trouble with all my symptoms, and didn't have the energy to stay sitting up. I took 10 mg of some Isordil that was 25 years old. Sure enough, within a couple of minutes, I started feeling better, and I could tell the difference minute by minute. After five minutes, I felt fine. This is one of the best responses I've ever had to Isordil. Of course I had that standard nitrate headache, but that's a headache I've learned to love, as it means that the drug is working, and I feel better in every other respect. Unfortunately, nitroglycerin (and Isordil) are very unpredictable, and tolerance, temporary or permanent, can develop after even one dose in the treatment of ME/CFS. But when these drugs work, they're great.
For antibiotics and antivirals, it's good to be more conservative, as it's usually important to get the full dose, and we don't know at what rate the potency of these drugs decays. However, the manufacturer is always very conservative about setting the expiration date. It has to be, due to the differences in the way different batches are made, shipped, stored etc. So it's always safe to take something a few months after it has expired (with the above noted exception). After that, then it partially depends on financial matters. If you can easily afford a new dose, then go ahead. Otherwise, you can start an older dose, and if it's not as effective as it should be (which has never happened to me), you can switch to a new prescription. Just make sure there's no gap between the old and the new. The equivalent of this is actually often done in standard practice, where a standard dose of an antibiotic may be given, and if the response is not satisfactory, the dose is raised.
It's always important to examine the drugs you use, especially if they're older. If they have turned color, started to crumble, or changed in any other way that is not expected, you should throw them out, regardless of their expiration date.
It's also important that you follow the instructions about storage closely. Most medicines say that they should be stored in a cool, dry place. This leaves out the bathroom and its medicine cabinet, as showers and baths are not exactly dry, and tend to heat up the room. Refrigeration or freezing is best, but only if the medicine explicitly says it's permitted (which is rare). Otherwise, the cold may damage the drug. All drugs have storage temperature instructions; if they don't come with your prescription (which they should) or you no longer have them, you can find them on the Web.
Here's a quote from another post where I answer the main part of that question:
Dr. Goldstein later switched to using Zantac on his patients for this reason. (Zantac hadn't been released in 1979.)
From later in that post:
So to this day, the results are considered "anecdotal", even though Dr. Goldstein continued to use Zantac (ranitidine) successfully until his retirement seven years later.
Think about it: Why should the drug companies (who fund most drug studies) fund an expensive study to see if Zantac, which is now an inexpensive OTC drug (especially when bought in its generic form) works as well as the expensive antivirals? Think of all the money they would lose if people switched from the expensive antivirals to Zantac! And you have to take the antivirals for a long time, whereas Zantac gets rid of all symptoms in one or two days when it works.
Dr. Goldstein found that Zantac could also improve all symptoms in about 20% of ME/CFS patients. You can see this post for further details. There is more discussion about Zantac in the rest of that thread.
I would certainly think so. And based on your history and symptoms, I think that it's unlikely that you have an active VZV infection.
Having chickenpox twice is quite rare (although you're the second example in this thread!) and it seems to always indicate a weak immune system (which is why we have multiple examples in this thread). Having measles twice is yet more evidence of that. Specifically, it sounds like you may have been having problems with your memory B cells; malfunctioning B cells have now been associated with ME/CFS, such as in the rituximab trials.
Im not sure, amny medicines are good 2 yrs after expiry date but some can be dangerous past expiry date like doxycycline. Give it a google?? Otherwise online source?
When I Googled "drug expiration danger", the first thing that came up was this excellent article from the Family Health Guide of the Harvard Medical School. One sample quote that shows the tone of the article:
I'd highly recommend reading the whole article.
i remember at work medications that had expired were kept and sent over to third world countries and the 2 years past expiry date was mentioned. 15yrs though is interesting.
@zzz In 1992 Dr. Goldstein put me on Zantac and had to immediately reduce the amount to half because I was so energized, I felt like walking on the ceiling. I don't know why I stopped taking it, probably because nobody here would prescribe it as with most of his protocol. When it was OTC I'd take it if I had something important to do and my energy was low. I never thought of it as an antiviral but will read up on that. Dr Driscol the EDS advocate uses Zantac also. Very interesting.
I've had chickenpox at about 7 or 8 years old and a mild case of shingles around my eye at about 59 which was the only time I took antivirals. Could Zantac be the wonder drug nobody wants us to know about?
Based on your response to Zantac and what Dr. Goldstein has published, it would seem to make sense for you to try the dosage he prescribed for you and take it on a regular basis. Based on what Dr. Goldstein wrote, it could very well have a major positive effect on your ME/CFS symptoms.
I think that it's one of them.
As far as I can tell, no one has been actively trying to suppress the knowledge of Zantac. It's just what Dr. Goldstein said: Everyone knows it's for ulcers, and besides, no formal clinical trials have been done. Of course, those trials take a lot of money. The end result is that people use expensive antivirals for long periods of time instead of Zantac, which is just fine with the drug companies. They don't even have to do anything.
You can also try a Google Site Search
Separate names with a comma.