Professor & patients' paper on the solvable biological challenge of ME/CFS: reader-friendly version
Simon McGrath provides a patient-friendly version of a peer-reviewed paper which highlights some of the most promising biomedical research on ME/CFS ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Statistics watch: spotting 'sexy but unreliable' results

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Simon, Jun 2, 2014.

  1. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    Understanding probability intuitively has been the focus of a lot of research in empirical economics. In many cases we form an opinion intuitively, then give reasons as to why its right. We don't form the opinions rationally, using math etc., then understand them intuitively. Probability and statistics professors who are tested (read Taleb or Kahneman etc. - spelling?) do well on the math, but ask them a real world problem and they typically get it wrong. This is empirically measurable.

    Intuition is high associative, and leads to confirmation bias.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page