Wanted by Llewellyn King: Member of Congress to take up the ME/CFS cause
Sasha reports on Llewellyn King’s campaign to find a lone Congress member to do the right thing ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Some papers on researcher bias/allegiance in psychiatry

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Esther12, Mar 19, 2013.

  1. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,695
    Likes:
    14,744
    I have these open, but am not going to be able to read them today, so thought I'd post them up. v Only the last one links to the full paper, and I've not yet searched to see if the others are available for free on-line somewhere.

    They could all be rubbish - I was reading something which assumed that these findings were all quite uncontroversial... but lots of false claims as seen as uncontroversially true by some.

    One on therapist's tendency to over-estimate their own efficacy:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22662416

    Some on the tendency of researchers to find that the therapy they like most is most effective in RCTs they run, even when others find different results:

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735813000275#gr1

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22946981

    https://psychology.sas.upenn.edu/system/files/Leykin CPSP 2009 Allegiance.pdf
     
    biophile, Dolphin and WillowJ like this.
  2. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,588
    Likes:
    16,531
    This paper is now free at: http://www.researchgate.net/publica...erview_of_reviews/file/3deec516856fa17ff9.pdf

     
    biophile, WillowJ and Esther12 like this.
  3. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,588
    Likes:
    16,531
  4. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,588
    Likes:
    16,531
    (from Munder et al., 2013)

    RA=Researcher allegiance

    This, from earlier in the paper, explains AAB
    It's not too important to understand this for most of the stuff. But basically, this is a review of reviews so one thing they looked at whether the reviewers might have a bias.


    .
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2014
    biophile likes this.
  5. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,588
    Likes:
    16,531
    Continues from Munder et al., 2013

     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2014
  6. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,588
    Likes:
    16,531
    Researcher allegiance is not something that has been discussed very much in the ME/CFS literature.

    One exception is with the PACE Trial, where the authors wrote in a comment on the protocol:

    The statistical plan also mentioned the collection of such data:


     
    Esther12 likes this.
  7. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,695
    Likes:
    14,744
    Dolphin and Valentijn like this.
  8. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,588
    Likes:
    16,531
    This is now available for free:

    Put: "An investigation of self-assessment bias in mental health providers" into Google Scholar http://scholar.google.com/ for the link (one gets a temporary link so there is no point me posting it).

     
    Last edited: May 27, 2014
    Sean and Esther12 like this.
  9. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,498
    Likes:
    23,259
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
  10. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,588
    Likes:
    16,531
    Ok. Put: "An investigation of self-assessment bias in mental health providers" into Google Scholar http://scholar.google.com/ and it's available free
     
    Esther12, Valentijn and alex3619 like this.
  11. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,498
    Likes:
    23,259
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    @Dolphin , this works. For anyone else, please use the quote marks in the search term on Google Scholar.
     
    Dolphin likes this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page