Ember
Senior Member
- Messages
- 2,115
In her “New Clinical Definitions for ME/CFS” presentation, Dr. Bateman acknowledges that a primary care clinician may not be able to accomplish a differential diagnosis when making an ME/CFS (SEID) diagnosis. That task may require the attention of a specialist: “We want primary care to be able to recognize; primary care can make these assessments; they can do orthostatic, you know, they can ask questions; they can understand what symptoms are present. They may need specialists to assure them that it's not another problem.”One thing that @Nielk said that I do agree with is that the ME/CFS diagnosis should be confirmed by specialists, just like a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis is confirmed by a neurologist. If a primary care physician suspects multiple sclerosis on the basis of a patient's symptoms, he will refer the patient to a neurologist who will confirm or deny the suspicion. The same should be true for ME/CFS: if your primary care doctor suspects ME/CFS (on the basis of the SEID criteria say), he should then ideally refer you to an ME/CFS specialist (who might be a neurologist) who will confirm or deny this using a series of more detailed criteria (such as the CCC / ICC) and preferably also some tests.
Dr. Bateman also acknowledges, however, the lack of such specialists: “Down the road hopefully, it'll land or nestle somewhere, you know, in a specialty area once we have the science a little more clear. So far, nobody really wants to claim it because it's intimidating, right? It's this illness that we don't really understand very well.” The CCC advises concerning exclusions, “It is essential to exclude certain diseases, which would be tragic to miss:"
But the exclusion of other diagnoses, which cannot be reasonably excluded by the patient's history and physical examination, won't likely be achieved by laboratory testing and imaging as none is suggested in the Report Guide for Clinicians.Exclusions: Exclude active disease processes that explain most of the major symptoms of fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain and cognitive dysfunction. It is essential to exclude certain diseases, which would be tragic to miss: Addison's disease, Cushing's Syndrome, hypothyroidism, iron deficiency, other treatable forms of anemia, iron overload syndrome, diabetes melitus, and cancer. It is also essential to exclude treatable sleep disorders such as upper airway resistance syndrome and obstructive or central sleep apnea; rheumatological disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinsonism, myasthenia gravis and B12 deficiency; infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, chronic hepatitis, Lyme disease, etc.; primary psychiatric disorders and substance abuse. Exclusion of other diagnoses, which cannot be reasonably excluded by the patient's history and physical examination, is achieved by laboratory testing and imaging. If a potential confounding medical condition is under control, then the diagnosis of ME/CFS can be entertained if patients meet the criteria otherwise.
Are ME patients content to be afforded neither laboratory testing nor imaging?
Last edited: