Free full text: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0689/is_n3_v45/ai_19891674/
I read this after seeing it referenced in:
It's a relatively easy read: no biology really (except mention of a few tests a doctor can do) and no maths (except a few percentages).
It's about physician paternalism (it uses this term twice I think - at least once anyway) - about physicians making decisions for patients rather than discussing the options with them.
I think this is relevant in terms of managing the condition: where often patients are pushed onto a rehab approach rather than being given the option of a pacing approach.
Shared decision-making: the case for letting patients decide which choice is best.
J Fam Pract. 1997 Sep;45(3):205-8.
Woolf SH.
I read this after seeing it referenced in:
"Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines"-Woolf et al., '99: http://forums.phoenixrising.me/show...ms-of-clinical-guidelines-quot-Woolf-et-al-99
It's a relatively easy read: no biology really (except mention of a few tests a doctor can do) and no maths (except a few percentages).
It's about physician paternalism (it uses this term twice I think - at least once anyway) - about physicians making decisions for patients rather than discussing the options with them.
I think this is relevant in terms of managing the condition: where often patients are pushed onto a rehab approach rather than being given the option of a pacing approach.