Scientific American online "Chronic fatigue findings were held back"

Scientific American Online has published the NatureNews article by Heidi Ledford, under the headline "Chronic fatigue findings were held back."

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=chronic-fatigue-findings

(If this has already been posted, please delete this message. :Retro smile: I looked & couldn't find it)

 

I hope someone replies to this comment which appears as the first one following the article:
It must be really difficult to do any kind of an actual study on a mythical disease/syndrome. I don't understand how anything can be learned about a disease that doesn't exist. Doesn't the fact that CFS is baloney sort of undermine a signinficant pillar in the study process. How is it even possible to perform a study on a fiction?? This all seems like a ridiculous waste of time and money that could be invested in doing something real about something real.

 

Unfortunately, the only reply to "ChrisJones'" comment that can think of is...

[video=youtube;QS0m9A3iQCI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS0m9A3iQCI[/video]

 

: )

Thanks for the link. I couldnt decide if that was a troll or a regular idiot - have commented anyway.