worldbackwards
Senior Member
- Messages
- 2,051
It's like a game of "not touching you", isn't it."You find a genuine quote from me saying "ME is all in the mind" and i owe you a bottle of wine" says Sir Simon.
Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
It's like a game of "not touching you", isn't it."You find a genuine quote from me saying "ME is all in the mind" and i owe you a bottle of wine" says Sir Simon.
Thank you, it made me easy to tweet those quotes and share them as #SimonSays.INVITED REVIEW The act of diagnosis: pros and cons of labelling chronic fatigue syndrome
MARCUS J. H. HUIBERS1* AND SIMON WESSELY
sounds very much like it is not all in the head.
Thank you, it made me easy to tweet those quotes and share them as #SimonSays.
Barsky describes four mechanisms by which this process of symptom amplification is mediated (Barsky & Borus, 1999): the belief that one has a serious disease; the expectation that one’s condition is likely to worsen; the sick role; and distress that comes from daily life problems and major life changes
the need for a formal diagnosis that drives them, but the search for relief, belief and understanding, something most doctors fail to see (Reid et al. 1991). Finding a label that fits one’s symptoms may bring that relief and legitimacy, especially if the label is a biomedical one, free from the stigma of psychiatric illness
Diagnosis can provide a refuge that preserves self-esteem and protects from (or takes away) stigma and the feeling of guilt. Diagnosis offers a socially accepted reason for failure to cope, especially if all miseries can be pinned on that disease
For fatigued patients in an acute or early phase, it may be more appropriate to postpone an official diagnosis of CFS because the label may stimulate chronicity, rather than a focus on possible solutions
Finally, it should be noted that our conclusions are primarily based on common sense, in the absence of a sound evidence base
In the absence of definitive data, and in the expectation that such definitive data will never appear, our final judgement is that it is acceptable to make diagnoses such as CFS, provided that this is the beginning, and not the end, of the therapeutic encounter.
How about not letting Wessely turn this into a bet of a bottle of wine over one quote?
He can keep his wine.
I admit this whole bottle of wine thing made me uncomfortable too. SW is a sneaky...er... fellow. Either he has some underhanded manipulative plan in place with this bet (and we're falling into his trap) or he's completely delusional about most of what he himself has said over the last... how many?... years. Either possibility is disturbing. I have no ability to deal effectively with master manipulators, so I can't figure this situation out, but it has left me with a very uncomfortable feeling that this is ultimately going to go bad.Don't mean to sound grumpy, but isn't it falling into the trap of allowing him to trivialise the matter? He's a sly psychoquack who'll mess with your head anytime you let him. Bets for a bottle of wine are something that friends and civilised people do. He is responsible for decades of horrendous abuse on an industrial scale. He can keep his wine.
Well of course there is the very attractive image of him publicly having to hand over a bottle of wine and admit he's wrong which will have us all scurrying to find the quote. But that's never going to happen, even if such a quote is found. He planted that very attractive fantasy image in our minds for a reason. To waste time and energy? To make the whole thing just about a quote instead of about the PACE trial? I don't like the fact that we are reacting to a task that he has set us. I'd prefer it if we dictate what happens next, and he can react, or not, and it makes no difference either way because the truth will out.I admit this whole bottle of wine thing made me uncomfortable too. SW is a sneaky...er... fellow. Either he has some underhanded manipulative plan in place with this bet (and we're falling into his trap) or he's completely delusional about most of what he himself has said over the last... how many?... years. Either possibility is disturbing. I have no ability to deal effectively with master manipulators, so I can't figure this situation out, but it has left me with a very uncomfortable feeling that this is ultimately going to go bad.
I admit this whole bottle of wine thing made me uncomfortable too. SW is a sneaky...er... fellow. Either he has some underhanded manipulative plan in place with this bet (and we're falling into his trap) or he's completely delusional about most of what he himself has said over the last... how many?... years. Either possibility is disturbing. I have no ability to deal effectively with master manipulators, so I can't figure this situation out, but it has left me with a very uncomfortable feeling that this is ultimately going to go bad.
i get the sense that Prof Coyne is his own person and stands up for what he says. i have a lot of respect for him.I think one has to be careful he doesn't try to lure someone like Coyne into a false or misquoted claim and then go for a libel route to shut him down completely. No doubt this would prompt another 5 page spread in the Times with the same old narrative.
His remarks do sound a bit like, "go on I dare you".
i get the sense that Prof Coyne is his own person and stands up for what he says. i have a lot of respect for him.
His remarks do sound a bit like, "go on I dare you"....
It's pathethic. i hope more professionals with tenure and leverage can speak up about horrible science that has been going on for 3long decades.Yes I understand Coyne stands up for what he says. My comment...
...was referring to Wessely. One also has to understand UK libel processes and how corrupt they can be. Basically he who has the most money and lawyers wins. Oh and it helps your chances of winning if you are doing the governments bidding.
Not sure how it would work on the basis of where the host site of the comments was based though.
I doubt Coyne would be easily fooled into saying you said, .....XYZ....... as a direct quote if he couldn't directly attribute it to him but I'm just saying. There's also the SMC that can spin another 5 page spread on "poor Wessely" anytime.
How much closer to saying it's all in the mind do we need to get?
http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/Quotable_Quotes_Updated.pdf
How much closer to saying it's all in the mind do we need to get?
http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/Quotable_Quotes_Updated.pdf
View attachment 13484