CFS_for_19_years
Hoarder of biscuits
- Messages
- 2,396
- Location
- USA
Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
his narrative needs to be about what the Wessely School have done to people with ME and how PACE is the pivot around which the paradigm is now spinning..throwing out exponential BPS constructs such as MUS like a Catherine Wheel careering out of control & spitting out sulphurous sparks to create the maximum amount of carnage.
The so-called PACE study is the school example of bad research, writes journal editor. Thus, the war of ME / chronic fatigue syndrome continues.
The researchers behind the strongly criticized PACE study will not participate in a scientific debate on the matter. It is disappointing, writes the editor of the Journal of Health Psychology, which dedicated a whole number to the debate around the study.
"They behaved as if they should have a kind of right not to respond to criticism, according to editor David F. Marks.
He writes that the magazine gave PACE researchers and others who support their view many opportunities to defend the study in peer-reviewed posts. Initially, Marks invited as many critics and defenders of the study to write in the theme number.
https://spoonseeker.com/2017/08/05/looking-at-the-evidence/As you may know, a few days ago the Journal of Health Psychology published a very important special issue critiquing in depth the controversial, deeply flawed PACE Trial, a study which purported to provide evidence for the use of graded exercise and a very specific type of CBT in the treatment of ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis, also known – misleadingly – as chronic fatigue syndrome or CFS).
Congratulations to the journal’s editor Prof David F Marks for taking the trouble to inform himself about the true situation regarding ME. He is one of very few scientists and health professionals who despite having no personal or pre-existing professional interest in the condition has made the effort to look at the facts and realise that – unlikely as it may seem to many – the PACE Trial and similar ‘research’ into ME by those with a fixed biopsychosocial mindset really is every bit as flawed, misleading and potentially damaging as patients have been claiming for years.
Dr David Tuller, Prof James Coyne, and Prof Jonathan Edwards are other rare free thinkers who have not been afraid to get informed and challenge the status quo – or to put it another way, to point out that the emperor is naked because that is what he is.
I don't know the evidence for this claim:
just needs a cat