• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Poll: Which methylB12 sublingual brands have you tried and found INeffective or no longer effective

Which methylB12 sublingual brands have you tried and found INeffective or no longer effective?

  • Source Naturals

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Natural Factors

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • AOR

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Life Extension

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Enzymatic Therapy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Superior Source

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Thorne Research

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • DaVinci Laboratories

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Protocol for Life Balance

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nutricology

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .
Messages
10
This poll is meant to be a sibling poll to Poll: Which methyl-B12 sublingual brands have you tried and found effective.

With the original poll alone, we can't see the difference between a brand that hasn't been tried versus a brand that has been tried and found to be ineffective (or less effective than the current gold standard). So I think there could be some utility in having the negative version of the poll: what brands are ineffective.

There has been some discussion about whether Jarrow has changed and is now less effective, see Jarrow-- did it change?.

In this poll, mark Jarrow as being ineffective even if it used to be effective for you, but isn't any longer.