Hi I did write a one page rebuttal of Peter White's comments, but the Journal Editor didnt even reply to me, despite two emails. I found the experience very bad in terms of the professionalism of the Journal. I picked JRSM because I wanted to paper to get a wide audience, you can have free access, however after my experience I will be reluctant to send any more papers to JRSM. I have revised my paper and will resubmit to another Journal. Whats more, upon submission to JRSM, I specifically asked for Peter White or Simon Wessely not to be used as reviewers, this is common practice, yet Peter White was used, and his review was poor. I'd love to hear from any other ME researchers with experience of publishing - its hard going up against the psycho-lobby alone.