Dr. Bateman answers IOM questions from the community: Part 1
Clark Ellis brings us Part 1 of an interview with Dr. Lucinda Bateman, where she answered questions posed by the patient community ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

"Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again"

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Dolphin, May 24, 2013.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,502
    Likes:
    16,012
    @bobbobme on Twitter drew my attention to this interesting study, although it was published in 1982:

     
    WillowJ, biophile, wdb and 1 other person like this.
  2. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,651
    Likes:
    14,486
    Thanks. I wonder if it would be harder to replicate now, as it would be more likely that the paper having already being published would be noticed.
     
    biophile likes this.
  3. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,502
    Likes:
    16,012
    Yes, probably harder to replicate. But that doesn't mean the same basic problem isn't around.
     
  4. Sean

    Sean Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,360
    Likes:
    9,745
    The more things change, the more they stay the same.
     
  5. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,439
    Likes:
    22,938
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    Details change, the principle underlying the problems doesn't.
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page