The Call for Opposition: Challenging the P2P and IOM Processes
In our second article on how to react to the publication of the draft P2P report, Gabby Klein provides her view of why she and a large group of advocates and patients are continuing their protest of the government’s ongoing control and manipulation of our disease via their processes...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

"Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again"

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Dolphin, May 24, 2013.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,394
    Likes:
    8,373
    @bobbobme on Twitter drew my attention to this interesting study, although it was published in 1982:

     
    WillowJ, biophile, wdb and 1 other person like this.
  2. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,805
    Likes:
    7,701
    Thanks. I wonder if it would be harder to replicate now, as it would be more likely that the paper having already being published would be noticed.
     
    biophile likes this.
  3. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,394
    Likes:
    8,373
    Yes, probably harder to replicate. But that doesn't mean the same basic problem isn't around.
     
  4. Sean

    Sean Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,733
    Likes:
    4,592
    The more things change, the more they stay the same.
     
  5. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,050
    Likes:
    17,470
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    Details change, the principle underlying the problems doesn't.
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page