1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
ME/CFS and the Magic of the Canine Factor
There's been plenty of research indicating that having pets is good for your health. I never really noticed any particular benefits to having cats, though that may have had more to do with my cats. They've been fairly indifferent to my presence and we've shared a live-and-let-live...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

PANDORA meeting with CDC

Discussion in 'Action Alerts and Advocacy' started by Nielk, Feb 14, 2011.

  1. Nielk

    Nielk

    Messages:
    5,464
    Likes:
    6,017
    Queens, NY
    see below:



    CDC Agrees to a Meeting
    On Tuesday, February 15 at 11:59 p.m., PANDORA will be discontinuing the petition to the CDC because we have received a commitment to one of the goals.

    Subsequent to the January 3 letter, signed by PANDORA and ten other patient organizations and other patient advocates, Dr. Elizabeth Unger with the CDC contacted PANDORA asking for a meeting to discuss how to develop future dialogue with patient organizations.

    She said she wants to establish venues to restore trust and will discuss the nine action points listed in the letter and petition.

    She agreed to a phone conference including representatives from other patient organizations that joined in this effort. This is expected to be in March, but we do not yet know exactly when.

    Thank you for participating. This is a first step.

    One Voice, as One Community, with One Cause.
     
  2. Merry

    Merry Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes:
    615
    Columbus, Ohio, USA
    Good news. Thanks, Nielk.
     
  3. Chris

    Chris Senior Member

    Messages:
    578
    Likes:
    176
    Victoria, BC
    Thanks, Nielk, and good for all you guys at PANDORA! Best, Chris
     
  4. Nielk

    Nielk

    Messages:
    5,464
    Likes:
    6,017
    Queens, NY
    I wonder if one of the nine poits mentioned in the letter was to fight for a name change?
     
  5. CBS

    CBS Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,378
    Likes:
    312
    Western US
    Letter to CDC from PANDORA

    Here's a link to an overview of the project and the main points of the letter: http://www.change.org/petitions/tel...rineimmu_disorders_org_for_resech_amp_adv_inc

    Patients could add their names to endorse the primary points and include additional comments if they wished to do so.

     
  6. WillowJ

    WillowJ Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,136
    Likes:
    2,828
    WA, USA
    good work!
     
  7. WillowJ

    WillowJ Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,136
    Likes:
    2,828
    WA, USA
    Please insist they remove the ICD-10-CM listing for CFS, NOC (not otherwise classified) under ill-defined symptoms and use only the CFS listing with ME and post-viral fatigue syndrome under neurological diseases.
     
  8. taniaaust1

    taniaaust1

    Messages:
    8,263
    Likes:
    5,216
    Sth Australia
    That's an awesome achievement. A huge step on the right direction :)
     
  9. eric_s

    eric_s Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,925
    Likes:
    73
    Switzerland/Spain (Valencia)
    Yes, very good. Thanks and keep it up. The more communication between ME/CFS groups and institutions like the CDC, NIH etc. the better. I just donated 10$ to Pandora, not much, but i'm sure it helps.
     
  10. Nielk

    Nielk

    Messages:
    5,464
    Likes:
    6,017
    Queens, NY
    Thanks much CBS.

    I see #6 tackles the issue of name change. Maybe here is our opportunity to give our input as to what name to change it to.

    What about CNEID: Chronic NeuroEndocrineImmune Disorder?

    Does anyone else have a different name in mind.

    If we can all agree on an acceptable name, we can send it to Marly Silverman because she is meeting up with the CDC
    Sometime in March.
     
  11. garcia

    garcia Aristocrat Extraordinaire

    Messages:
    936
    Likes:
    104
    London, UK
    Personally I would get rid of the word "Chronic". "Chronic" is often seen as a euphemism for "trivial", i.e. not acute, not serious, not worthy of attention.

    And what matters more than the name is the case definition that will be used to back up the name.
     
  12. RivkaRivka

    RivkaRivka Senior Member

    Messages:
    324
    Likes:
    119
    i'm very excited to read about this meeting with the cdc. thank you for organizing this effort.

    this meeting happening at more or less the same time as the CDC protest in atlanta? all i can say is, "perfect!!!" going at it from two different angles -- the calm meeting angle and the impatient and loud protest angle -- both at the same time, yes!, that is just what is needed.

    sickie in bed,
    rivka
     
  13. WillowJ

    WillowJ Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,136
    Likes:
    2,828
    WA, USA
    I'm with you, garcia
     
  14. usedtobeperkytina

    usedtobeperkytina Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,395
    Likes:
    220
    Clay, Alabama
    Here is a survey

    In case you miss it in another thread, here is a link to a survey. We want to hear what patients want: http://survey.constantcontact.com/survey/a07e3f2r0fagk8q0b3y/start

    Just a reminder, Dr. Unger is not in the CDC department that is doing XMRV research. But some of the things in the list, like changing the criteria and working with other researchers, might have an impact on their XMRV research.

    You may remember that the last study done by Bill Switzer at the CDC was in a totally different department. It is in the department that does retrovirus research.

    Tina
     
  15. Nina

    Nina Senior Member

    Messages:
    220
    Likes:
    14
    I should like to think that as the head of CFS research, Dr. Unger has some influence on XMRV research, even if that is conducted somewhere else at the CDC.

    Tina, will PANDORA be requesting a meeting with the department for retroviral research then?

    I honestly think a meeting with the CDC that excludes XMRV as a prominent topic isn't the best you can do right now.
     
  16. usedtobeperkytina

    usedtobeperkytina Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,395
    Likes:
    220
    Clay, Alabama
    Of course

    of course, the letter had many points. There was no way to know if or which of the points would cause a response. The invitation came as a complete surprise.

    As said, it is a first step. No idea who in CDC is invited also. Basically, PANDORA is an invited guest.

    It is an opportunity to start the conversation, which is the first point.

    Actually, if Unger has any peripheral role in XMRV besides providing samples for their research, this meeting might be an opportunity find this out.

    What we do know she has some influence over is the criteria for who is included in the samples. You may notice, that is one of the points.

    Tina
     
  17. justinreilly

    justinreilly Stop the IoM & P2P! Adopt CCC!

    Messages:
    2,490
    Likes:
    1,175
    NYC (& RI)
    I agree fully. Also would favor Disease over Disorder in this example.

    I think most people like ME for now, as I do, since that is the official name since 1969 and has the most use and traction. There are other long threads on the name issue, though PR's search engine leaves a lot to be desired so it may not be easy to find them. if you want to discuss this i suggest finding (or starting) another thread. I do think that a specific name should be asked for at the meeting. asking them to look into it or something like that will just result in them dragging their feet as usual.

    I think ICD 10 CM should be addressed as one of the top 3 topics.

    If they can't agree on CCC, the least they MUST do NOW is ditch Reeves def. and declare it invalid. this is isssue #1 for me.

    Thanks to PANDORA for soliciting patient input.
     
  18. jace

    jace Off the fence

    Messages:
    855
    Likes:
    170
    England
    Our disease should be called ME and ME/CFS when there are issues of understanding. The criteria should be the Canadian Consensus definition.

    Of course, in the future, research may come up with answers re causation, and at that point the definition and the name will change. Until that time, why re-invent the wheel?
     
  19. Mark

    Mark Acting CEO

    Messages:
    4,532
    Likes:
    2,016
    Sofa, UK
    @Justin: Tip: If struggling with PR's search engine (eg for short searches like 'ME' or 'CDC' which are too short for it), try using google. Add "site:forums.aboutmecfs.org" to your google query and you end up with a full google search of PR. Much better :)

    jace: There's very broad agreement on demanding the use of the CCC for research purposes, but for diagnostic purposes there are lots of problems with that, and we are working on a formulation that would allow everyone to support such a call. In particular, if you are proposing to remove the diagnostic label from millions of sick people, you have to also say something about what you are suggesting for those people instead - and don't expect them to support it if your answer is "I don't care, throw them to the psychs": many or most of those people are physically ill too, whether with ME or something else (even if there are people with simply depression mixed in as well...and assuming you don't think that depression has physical causes too...). And note that some of those people may currently be in partial remission from some symptoms in the CCC, or may not yet have developed them all - our top doctors all agree that these patterns exist and need to be provided for. And also note that the authorities, if they accept that proposal regarding using the CCC as diagnostic criteria, would then use it to deny benefits etc to anybody who doesn't fit the definition. We've been discussing the problems on the following thread, looking for a formulation that can be wholeheartedly endorsed by all of us, so that we can all be united in campaigning on what is one of the most important issues of all, for all of us - I'd welcome your thoughts on that discussion:
    http://forums.aboutmecfs.org/showth...r-community-s-differences&p=157280#post157280
     
  20. Nielk

    Nielk

    Messages:
    5,464
    Likes:
    6,017
    Queens, NY
    As far as name change:

    Crohn's disease is named after Dr.Crohn who first studied cases in 1932 in Mt. Sinai Hospital.
    Till the it was called Ileitis and they renamed it Crohn's disease after Dr. Crohn

    A Dr. Ramsey studied the first outbreak of Chronic Fatigue patients in the royal Free Hospital in the mid 1950s.
    How about changing the name to: Ramsey's Disease?

    What do you guys think?
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page