Discussion in 'Latest ME/CFS Research' started by Dolphin, Oct 9, 2014.
Free full text- http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/10/e005920.full
There was a bit of psychobabble speculation in the discussion, and little discussion of physical causes except "central sensitisation" which can lead to patient blaming I think:
There may be somebody somewhere e.g. from the Netherlands, who might be interested in the review history http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/10/e005920.reviewer-comments.pdf as van de Putte recommends against publication (apart from the criteria point, I don't think I'd agree).
The initial bit of the review is surprising in that it says the study is not new so shouldn't be published. What happened to the desire to have replicated studies.
You can also try a Google Site Search
Separate names with a comma.