Give ME the Money
Graham McPhee spells out some of the cold, hard facts about the dismal state of ME research and politics, and has some suggestions as to what we can do about it ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

PACE Trial - letters that were not accepted by the Lancet

Discussion in 'Latest ME/CFS Research' started by Dolphin, Apr 18, 2011.

  1. oceanblue

    oceanblue Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,174
    Likes:
    344
    UK
    CBT/GET results suggest their underlying assumptions do not hold for most patients

    another unpublished letter I've been asked to post:

     
  2. Uno

    Uno Senior Member

    Messages:
    119
    Likes:
    35
    Brighton, United Kingdom
  3. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,087
    Likes:
    7,019
    North Wales ME Research Forum letter

    North Wales ME Research Forum letter

     
  4. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,087
    Likes:
    7,019
    Anna K Sheridan's letter

    Anna K Sheridan's letter:

     
  5. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,087
    Likes:
    7,019
    Another person who wishes to remain anonymous. They sent two:


    --------------------------


     
  6. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,087
    Likes:
    7,019
    From jace:

     
  7. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,087
    Likes:
    7,019
    Another letter:

     
  8. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,087
    Likes:
    7,019
    ME Research UK: Moving beyond psychosocial therapies

    This one from ME Research UK didn't make it either unfortunately:

     
  9. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,087
    Likes:
    7,019
    CFIDS Association of America

    CFIDS Association of America:
    http://www.cfids.org/research/lancet-letter.pdf
     
  10. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,087
    Likes:
    7,019
    This person, who wishes to remain anonymous, only got a rejection letter yesterday - I'm guessing this may mean it nearly made the cut.

     
  11. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member

    Messages:
    291
    Likes:
    996
    People who had letters turned down by the Lancet could probably post them now here: http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f5963?tab=responses on the BMJs as an e-letter:

    The BMJ says such e-letters can be considered published/similar and have their own unique link so can be quoted in the future.

    Ideally, I'd like at least one other person to post as Sean Lynch (psychiatrist) has dismissed my concerns and I'd be in a stronger position to post again if somebody else posted.

    You can read the White et al. letter when it was an e-letter here: http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f5731?tab=responses .

    The BMJ posts most e-letters it reaches. Some don't even have any references.
     
    Valentijn and SickOfSickness like this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page