Hope, I do agree with you, but we are stakeholders and this relatively small group took it upon themselves to do this. This has been in the works for some time. It looks to me like the ME ICC came out and was much stronger than anyone had anticipated so they had to try to incorporate it to appease patients, but this does not seem to be a rational approach. The blanket CFSAC endorsement as proof of support? Many really have written off the CFSAC in general. They have hardly been on top of things. And even as such, have heard many CFSAC recommendations passed without the support of all members, so listing every CFSAC member from its inception as supporting this proposal seems disingenuous and misleading.