By itself, it wont accomplish much. However we can then state the experts disagreed. We can show the committee panel knows that. We can show that any conclusion is controversial. It opens up paths for future advocacy. Even if things go as badly as we suspect, and the IOM panel endorses something we seriously disagree with, advocacy will continue. Its not like we can just accept nonsense, we have few options. Accepting disability and death, or very poor medical conclusions, are not things that many of us are going to agree with.