http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2015.1110622
Original Articles
On the relationship between subjective and objective measures of fatigue
DOI:
10.1080/00140139.2015.1110622
Ina Völkera*,
Christine Kirchnera &
Otmar Leo Bocka
Publishing models and article dates explained
- Received: 11 May 2015
- Accepted: 14 Oct 2015
- Published online: 07 Dec 2015
Abstract
Objective:
Objective and subjective methods have been used in the past to assess workplace fatigue, but little is known about correlations between them.
We examine correlations between subjective and objective measures, including measures collected in a workplace scenario.
Methods:
15 young and 17 older participants were assessed before and after work with four types of fatigue measure: objective physical (posturography), objective mental (psychomotor vigilance task), subjective physical and mental (self-assessment), objective and subjective realistic (oculomotor behaviour, observer-rated facial expression, typing performance).
Results:
Pre- and post-test scores were analysed with an ANOVA, significant differences were submitted to a factor analysis.
It yielded three factors: one representing posturography, the second self-rated mental and physical fatigue and the third observer-rated facial expression.
Conclusions:
Results advocate the existence of three independent fatigue components: Objective physical fatigue, introspective and extrospective fatigue.
Practitioner Summary:
This study analyses correlations between different subjective and objective fatigue markers to better understand the complex nature of workplace fatigue.
Measurements were conducted directly at the workplace.
Results reveal that fatigue comprises three independent fatigue components: Objective physical fatigue, introspective and extrospective fatigue.
Keywords
