I've noticed that there is no substance to any of the negative comments attached to Jennie. There just seems to be a generalised condemnation based purely on a past association with the CAA. Our opinions and our advocacy work evolve over time. Instead of speculating about individuals, and smearing someone's character (for past associations; or for 'liking' someone's post; or for the 'tone' of a post) why don't we assess the merits of the work that people carry out, and focus on the IOM committee itself? I'll judge all IOM presentations on their content.