The Call for Opposition: Challenging the P2P and IOM Processes
In our second article on how to react to the publication of the draft P2P report, Gabby Klein provides her view of why she and a large group of advocates and patients are continuing their protest of the government’s ongoing control and manipulation of our disease via their processes...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

(Not ME/CFS-specific) A catalog of biases in questionnaires

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Dolphin, Jul 30, 2011.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,971
    Likes:
    6,494
    This article, which is available for free at the above link, is easier to read than most published papers I think and the examples aren't particularly technical/are often very straightforward.

    I previously highlighted another paper which listed biases but it was more dense : http://forums.phoenixrising.me/show...earch-(Sackett-1979-but-seems-to-be-a-classic) . However I think that is also worth a look as a lot of the biases in the Choi paper could be called "errors". But as I say this paper is quite easy to read. It's handy to have a name to give to problems with questionnaires (and to be able to reference the term).

    *I gave each line its own paragraph
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page