Fluge & Mella's pre-trial study highlights life-changing potential of rituximab
Sasha gives the background and Simon gives the interpretation of the latest study from Haukeland, published today...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

(Not ME/CFS-specific) A catalog of biases in questionnaires

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Dolphin, Jul 30, 2011.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,497
    Likes:
    8,799
    This article, which is available for free at the above link, is easier to read than most published papers I think and the examples aren't particularly technical/are often very straightforward.

    I previously highlighted another paper which listed biases but it was more dense : http://forums.phoenixrising.me/show...earch-(Sackett-1979-but-seems-to-be-a-classic) . However I think that is also worth a look as a lot of the biases in the Choi paper could be called "errors". But as I say this paper is quite easy to read. It's handy to have a name to give to problems with questionnaires (and to be able to reference the term).

    *I gave each line its own paragraph
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page