Invest in ME Conference 12: First Class in Every Way
OverTheHills wraps up our series of articles on this year's 12th Invest in ME International Conference (IIMEC12) in London with some reflections on her experience as a patient attending the conference for the first time.
Discuss the article on the Forums.

"Non-financial conflicts of interests in psychiatric research and practice" (Maj, 2008) & BJ Psych

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Dolphin, Apr 21, 2013.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,688
    Likes:
    28,225
    I just learned, via a James C. Coyne blog, of the following (see bolded bit) in the BJ Psychiatry's "Instructions for authors"
    (http://bjp.rcpsych.org/site/misc/ifora.xhtml):


    I also just read the following Br J Psychiatry paper which is free at:
    http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/193/2/91.long :


    -----
    The paper is only two pages long, and doesn't require any mathematical or scientific knowledge, so should be fairly accessible.

    I have got frustrated that some people have only brought up financial conflicts of interest as a possible problem in the ME and CFS field.
     
    Battery Muncher, Jarod, Simon and 8 others like this.
  2. Simon

    Simon

    Messages:
    1,927
    Likes:
    14,578
    Monmouth, UK
    Just pulled out this quote from that paper where he talks of the:
    This problems of allegiance-to-theory bias seems to be dicussed surprisingly often in psychological research, though I haven't ever seen this translating to researchers disclosing allegiance-to-thoeries in 'conflict of interest' declarations.
     
  3. Sean

    Sean Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,257
    Likes:
    17,985
    So,

    (very modest subjective 'therapeutic' effect) x (100 - 69%) = ?

    :whistle:
     
    biophile likes this.
  4. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,449
    Likes:
    28,523
    Yeah - a lot of this sort of research leaves me thinking "Medicine needs to be made smaller". We shouldn't be routinely using treatments unless there's really good evidence that they're going to do more good than harm, and we often do not have that. If it is being made clear to a patient that they are trying an experimental treatment which may do more harm than good, and are provided access to the available data, then patients can make up their own minds about how to proceed.
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page