1. Patients launch a $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
Leptin
Andrew Gladman reflects upon the recent IACFS/ME conference and the buzz surrounding a small molecule, leptin.
Discuss the article on the Forums.

"No evidence for XMRV association in pediatric idiopathic diseases in France" aug 2

Discussion in 'XMRV Research and Replication Studies' started by Frickly, Aug 2, 2010.

  1. Frickly

    Frickly Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,046
    Likes:
    34
    Texas
    http://www.retrovirology.com/content/7/1/63
    Eric Jeziorski , Vincent Foulongne , Catherine Ludwig , Djamel Louhaem , Gilles Chiocchia , Michel Segondy , Michel Rodiere , Marc Sitbon and Valerie Courgnaud

    Retrovirology 2010, 7:63doi:10.1186/1742-4690-7-63


    Published: 2 August 2010

    Abstract (provisional)
    Retroviruses have been linked to a variety of diseases such as neoplastic and immunodeficiency disorders and neurologic and respiratory diseases. Recently, a novel infectious human retrovirus, the xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV), has been identified in cohorts of patients with either a familial type of prostate cancer or chronic fatigue syndrome. The apparent unrelatedness of these diseases raised the question of the potential involvement of XMRV in other diseases. Here, we investigated the presence of XMRV in a selection of pediatric idiopathic infectious diseases with symptoms that are suggestive of a retroviral infection, as well as in children with respiratory diseases and adult patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Using a XMRV env-nested PCR, we screened 72 DNA samples obtained from 62 children hospitalized in the Montpellier university hospital (France) for hematological, neurological or inflammatory pathologies, 80 DNA samples from nasopharyngeal aspirates from children with respiratory diseases and 19 DNA samples from SpA. None of the samples tested was positive for XMRV or MLV-like env sequences, indicating that XMRV is not involved in these pathologies.
  2. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,873
    Likes:
    4,168
    Hmmm... zero positives.

    Either they're not able to detect XMRV in patients, or those finding 3-6% in the general population are getting false positives.

    Where's the NIH paper!!>!
  3. Jemal

    Jemal Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,030
    Likes:
    54
    Another negative study... need more positive studies.
    Or maybe XMRV can't swim ;)

  4. taniaaust1

    taniaaust1 Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,746
    Likes:
    3,325
    Sth Australia
    Only 19 of the study participants were adults. Even if they were testing properly during this study... it wouldnt be unreasonable to think that no XMRV may be found, with those numbers if it is only about 3% in those kinds of populations. One would think it would be at a rate of far less in children due to less time to have been exposured to it at some point.... and on top of that, maybe many of the transmissions of it is happening sexually, so hence it could be much rarer in children..
  5. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,873
    Likes:
    4,168
    Some have speculated that XMRV infection occurs primarily from parents to children...

    but you're right. We don't really know what's going on, and it's possible the prevalence is much lower in children than adults.
  6. Jemal

    Jemal Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,030
    Likes:
    54
    This makes sense.
    Also I am wondering what kind of symptoms these children were displaying. I don't think they belong to the typical CFS cohort:

  7. Wasbeer

    Wasbeer

    Messages:
    78
    Likes:
    0
    Amersfoort, Netherlands
    And it's not allowed to go through customs on intercontinental flights, didn't you know that?
  8. thegodofpleasure

    thegodofpleasure Player in a Greek Tragedy

    Messages:
    113
    Likes:
    1
    Matlock, Derbyshire, Uk
    Blood samples were not collected correctly in order to preserve XMRV

    I note that the blood samples used in this study were not collected (& the RNA preserved) in Heparin tubes - which I understand is an important part of any testing protocol which has so far managed to isolate the XMRV retrovirus.

    Again, I don't think that this negative paper will stand up to close scrutiny.

    TGOP
  9. Cort

    Cort Phoenix Rising Founder

    Messages:
    7,025
    Likes:
    423
    Raleigh, NC
    It was certainly an interesting try...they were looking for it in children with mysterious flu-like illnesses "idiopathic infectious diseases' - which sounds like it could be close to CFS as well as a group with respiratory problems. Until a test is validated, though, I wonder if anyone should expect to find the bug - it doesn't seem to be happening. If they are all doing the normal PCR stuff they are wasting their money.
  10. George

    George waitin' fer rabbits

    Messages:
    846
    Likes:
    44
    South Texas
    They came to this conclusion based on a 1994 MLV study.

    If you notice they used nested PCR for the env gene which according to the Dr.'s Ruscetti is where the deletion is in XMRV. I haven't seen anything that indicates a deletion in the gag gene. I think this may be where many of the negative papers are making their mistakes. XMRV may share a <90% likeness to MLV's but it is not an MLV and considering that it is closer to SFFV MLV than say MoMLV you have to pick the right MLV.

    Then you have this lovely prognostication. (grins) Me thinks they are going to be a bit surprised about the coming realities. (grins)

    Correct no heprin tubes and the lab work does not meet the WPI standards for detecting XMRV anyway.

    Wrong sequences, they did not have controls and excuse me but there doesn't even seem to be a spiked copy to go on to make sure they could find it!

    Well, sweety I'll tell ya why cause you guys need to go back and learn to read!!!!!!!!!

    I mean this has got to be the sloppiest study of them all. Woof, This one get's NO PAWS
  11. Otis

    Otis Señor Mumbler

    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes:
    114
    USA
    Yup. Not another negative study, just another bad one.

    They looked in a good combination of places (blood, lung, CSF) but you gotta know how to find it.
  12. SOC

    SOC Back to work (easy, part-time work)

    Messages:
    4,388
    Likes:
    4,268
    USA
    Here's another lousy paper full of problems that should have been caught in peer-review. What kind of peer reviewers let this sort of garbage through? Why was this even published? Who published this?

    Retrovirology

    This is the 4th lousy paper in Retrovirology refuting the connection between XMRV and ME/CFS, I believe. Shouldn't we be asking ourselves, "Why so many in one journal?" Is it possible that no one else will publish this garbage? What's Retrovirology got invested in this?

    We may have found a confederate of our detractors that we might be able to take on much more easily than we can the CDC.
  13. jennyh80

    jennyh80

    Messages:
    1
    Likes:
    0
    Chicago, IL
    They need to look in a huge neglected population...kids with autism! Right now that is at 1.5% of the population, at least.
  14. thegodofpleasure

    thegodofpleasure Player in a Greek Tragedy

    Messages:
    113
    Likes:
    1
    Matlock, Derbyshire, Uk
    It is a particularly undesirable / unwelcome study because it will have the effect of disuading other groups from looking for an XMRV association with these diseases - at least for the time being.

    A real spoiler of a study
  15. xrayspex

    xrayspex Senior Member

    Messages:
    656
    Likes:
    70
    u.s.a.
    sickofcfs and godofpleasure you make 2 good dif points,
    first of all should someone make a concerted effort to find out if retrvirology is somehow invested in helping cover up?
    this is what someone more knowledgable than I just pointed out:

    What's interesting is that CDC and NIAID have a vested interest in keeping us buried, because otherwise they have some serious 'splainin' to do.

    But National Cancer Institute (NCI), is ALSO part of NIH, and is in general more highly respected in the scientific community. They are the ones who said they found XMRV in an even larger patient cohort.

    And they are joined by the blood products division of FDA.

    So it is two divisions within NIH pitched against each other - NCI v. NIAID - and then CDC v. FDA.

    ------
    and 2ndly gop you say "spoiler of a study"--but if its true it was poor protocol wouldnt real scientists and institutions see thru that? what can we do to expose this?

    oh so regarding the blurb I shared about the politics if NIAID has reason to cover up perhaps that journal is in bed with them, retrovirology.
    I know it happens for example, at least in the 60s, JAMA gave special preference to east coast med research over midwest, I know this for a fact
  16. thegodofpleasure

    thegodofpleasure Player in a Greek Tragedy

    Messages:
    113
    Likes:
    1
    Matlock, Derbyshire, Uk
    Questionable Peer Review

    As others have already commented, the quality of peer review in this journal has to be questioned. If, by a bit of judicious background reading, complete amateurs like myself can pick out the deficiencies in a paper such as this one (wrong sampling tubes, wrong protein targets etc.) then why aren't the peer reviewers doing so? :eek:

    Given our evident superior skills, perhaps we could tap into a new source of income as freelance peer reviewers for "Retrovirology"

    TGOP :D

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page