1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
Can You Come for a Visit? My ME/CFS Says No
My daughter and son-in-law just had a baby last week. We are thrilled. But we won't be able to see the baby or hold her any time soon. We won't be able to take over little gifts or help out with housework or babysitting.
Discuss the article on the Forums.

new CFS/XMRV Task Force at Dept of Health & Human Services?

Discussion in 'XMRV Research and Replication Studies' started by fresh_eyes, Nov 25, 2009.

  1. fresh_eyes

    fresh_eyes happy to be here

    Messages:
    900
    Likes:
    5
    mountains of north carolina
    Anybody know anything about this? From the CAA, in today's CFIDSLink:

    "In recent weeks, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has formed an interagency task force that is meeting regularly to appropriately replicate the CFS studies, address validation studies, development of appropriate screening and diagnostic tests, and to address the safety of the blood supply. There has not yet been a formal statement from the Department about this interagency effort..."

    (on Facebook here: http://www.facebook.com/notes/whitt...-getting-right-and-giving-thanks/217326755538)

    I'd like to know which agencies are represented, who is representing them, how often they're meeting, what exactly is on the agenda, when they expect to have information to share, etc!
     
  2. anne

    anne Guest

    This is such a big deal and I'm a bit surprised it's just been dropped into a Thanksgiving message. (But I could just be greedy for information.) The obvious question is, okay, replication studies, great, but what's their cohort? This does us no good if the CDC is supplying it.
     
  3. fresh_eyes

    fresh_eyes happy to be here

    Messages:
    900
    Likes:
    5
    mountains of north carolina
    Well, that was my reaction as well, so if you're greedy, that makes two of us! I'm afraid it looks like more evidence that the CAA is still not quite "getting it".

    Exactly - which is why we want to know who is on this committee and what they're doing!

    On the plus side, the very fact that this committee has been formed (in recent weeks no less - since the Cleveland Clinic meeting??) suggests to me that preliminary study results (surely studies are already in process, right?) might be confirming the XMRV hypothesis, or at least not blowing it out of the water. I mean, CAA was privy to pre-publication into from Mikovitz, right? And sort of blew it by leaking it? Who knows what else they might know by now.
     
  4. DSan

    DSan Guest

    Seems like the CAA is somewhat desperate to be perceived as still an "insider" in all this by leaking info and putting out hints. If so, that would put them in the "leaky media" category which is far removed from the relevant advocacy they tout. Of course, it can be strongly argued that their relevance is too wrapped around the CDC to matter at this point.

    DSan
     
  5. fresh_eyes

    fresh_eyes happy to be here

    Messages:
    900
    Likes:
    5
    mountains of north carolina
    Wow! Wildaisy, great thinking to contact Wanda J! I am more and more impressed with her. Now there's an advocate! (Doing a "Go Wanda" happy dance. In my mind.)
     
  6. Cort

    Cort Phoenix Rising Founder

    Messages:
    7,025
    Likes:
    441
    Raleigh, NC
    This CAA stuff is getting blown way out of proportion. Yes it would have been good if they'd provided more information but this

    is crazy in my opinion. They put out fresh information on a new study which is of interest to us all - and their reward for doing so is to be called 'somewhat desperate' and to be put into the 'leaky media category'.

    Then they are accused of being wrapped around the CDC! If you think they're wrapped around the CDC check out this page of their interactions with the CDC. They have spent more time and more effort - by several magnitudes - going after the CDC over the past couple of years than any other organization. Its not even close!

    http://www.cfids.org/cfidslink/2009/070108.asp
     
  7. fresh_eyes

    fresh_eyes happy to be here

    Messages:
    900
    Likes:
    5
    mountains of north carolina
    The CAA has posted the following comment on Facebook:

    "We'll have more info about the HHS task force next week."
     
  8. _Kim_

    _Kim_ Guest

    Wildaisy, you are ON today!! What a thought - ask Wanda. So smart of you.

    Thanks, Kim
     
  9. Cort

    Cort Phoenix Rising Founder

    Messages:
    7,025
    Likes:
    441
    Raleigh, NC
    The CAA is not a rah-rah group - don't go to them for that but they are very professional (almost too professional!) and when they say something you can pretty much count on the fact that they've done their homework. They cross their T's and dot their i's. I appreciate that.

    It could very well be that they're waiting on this

    before they provide more information about the interagency effort. Institutions hate it when you step on their announcements; if the CAA wants to continue to be privy to interagency efforts it may very well behoove them not to mention the particulars until the agencies involved announce it themselves.

     
  10. Daisymay

    Daisymay Senior Member

    Messages:
    261
    Likes:
    274
    Thanks Wildaisy, Go Wanda


    I like it! I

    I think Wanda is great, she is really on side and caring.

    Thanks so much for finding this info Wildaisy, this is great news, apart from the fact that the CDC is involved and which blood samples are they using, I would assume though that WPI and Dr Mikovits have really made sure this problem is well understood? I surely hope so......
     
  11. mezombie

    mezombie Senior Member

    Messages:
    324
    Likes:
    20
    East Coast city, USA
    Wanda Jones continues to impress!

    Now there's the transparency and communication we've been looking for!

    Thanks for sharing this, Wildaisy
     
  12. fresh_eyes

    fresh_eyes happy to be here

    Messages:
    900
    Likes:
    5
    mountains of north carolina
    Daisymay, I took the above to mean that 1) the CDC is not represented by a Reevesian, ("retrovirus expertise") and 2) that the studies are all using the same techniques and they're the ones Mikovits used. Both enormous changes from the bad old Osler's Web days at the CDC.
     
  13. anne

    anne Guest

    That's not true. People have commented on it on another topic. We're just talking about that very tantalizing tidbit. And I freely admit my frustration is simply DYING to know more.
     
  14. Daisymay

    Daisymay Senior Member

    Messages:
    261
    Likes:
    274
    CDC blood samples

    Yes I understood the same, standardised reagents (and hopefuly not Reeves involved, though same organisation with a lot of history to hide, though maybe now they will come good) but it is the question of them using CDC stored blood samples from supposed CFS patients, for example Georgia Wichita study as defined by CDC definition of CFS, which we all know is a load of bunkum, which is the problem.

    Willl they be using these blood samples to try and find XMRV?

    Hopefully not......'cos that would serioulsy screw the findings, well at least the CDC's findings.

    The retroviral guys at the CDC may be kosher but are they aware of all the diagnostic criteria problems? They may just use the blood in good faith not knowing the problems?

    Or they may know full well about these problems........

    We realy need to know that they are using the same diagnostic criteria as WPI.
     
  15. Cort

    Cort Phoenix Rising Founder

    Messages:
    7,025
    Likes:
    441
    Raleigh, NC
    Its going to be interesting. Dr. Miller told me the CDC is very aware of the diagnostic problems and that is one reason why they are asking other researchers/clinicians for blood samples. They also have 20 samples from the WPI that are positive for XMRV - so they can focus on those - make sure they're doing the test right and then assess the rest.

    They should have four or five groups of CFS patients! Patients who met the CDC definition in the late 1990's but not in 2001/2, patients who met the definition both times, patients who met the Empirical definition in 2006 or whatever and then CFS patients who met the definition later. What a mess!

    Unless they have samples from 'certified' CFS patients they're not going to be able to replicate the WPI's results. They'll be doing their own study on their own set of patients. All they need to do is find it in a significant subset (10-20%?) and I'll be happy.
     
  16. fresh_eyes

    fresh_eyes happy to be here

    Messages:
    900
    Likes:
    5
    mountains of north carolina
    I see what you mean, Daisymay. This is total guess on my part, but I bet they'll go ahead and use CDC banked samples for a study, knowing full well that they're questionable, partly to figure out just how bad they are. If, as Cort points out, it's 10-20% XMRV+, that will be informative in itself, showing that we were right about the flawed cohort (since about 5x as many people have Reeves' Disease, right?). This in conjunction with lots of other studies using a better cohort. That's my guess, today - feeling very optimistic right now. :)
     
  17. Daisymay

    Daisymay Senior Member

    Messages:
    261
    Likes:
    274
    CDC blood samples

    Yea, feeling v optimistic too!

    Hopefully with all these researchers on the case it will all pan out OK.

    And with the MERUK research announced to day things are looing good.
     
  18. hvs

    hvs Senior Member

    Messages:
    292
    Likes:
    0
    Cort! You know I love you, dude, but you don't see anything unwise about using the word "crazy" on a CFS forum? :rolleyes:

    Man, I'm not sure it's the right idea to accuse those who disagree with you of getting worked up and then losing your cool.

    I've heard reasonable arguments that the CAA is $#$@!ing the pooch these days and that, on balance, they're doing alright. But apparently no one has the market totally cornered on reason and calm.

    ---

    I would just add that WildDaisy appears to have gotten us more information by emailing Wanda Jones than the CAA was able to provide. :)
    Way to go WildDaisy!
     
  19. Sing

    Sing Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,362
    Likes:
    579
    New England
    Re: Cort's post

    I liked Cort's message as it was aimed to restore perspective. I wouldn't take it personally that he used a word like "crazy". Some of us can get carried away in fear, speculation and attributions of motives that may not be the case. (I've done it myself.) And then a splash of cold water or occasionally a large STOP sign can help one sober up. I always see Cort as trying to keep this forum as realistic and useful for everyone as possible.

    THanks!

    Cecelia
     
  20. starryeyes

    starryeyes Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes:
    4
    Bay Area, California
    I don't know... we'll see... this is very scary. I don't trust any list that has the CDC on it. It's way worse that they have so many other big names working with them on this. I don't trust them at all.

    Thank you Wildaisy for contacting Wanda Jones, that was a smart move. Wanda Jones is really coming through for us. :)
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page