1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
AVIVA Semi-Finals: National ME/FM Action Network is competing for $100,000
The National ME/FM Action Network in Canada is competing for $100,000 for biomedical research of ME and FM in the Aviva Community Fund contest. With thanks to all who helped, they made it through the first round of voting into the Semi-Finals.
Discuss the article on the Forums.

New blog from Dr. Deckoff-Jones: A Reason For Hope

Discussion in 'Media, Interviews, Blogs, Talks, Events about XMRV' started by Jemal, Sep 23, 2011.

  1. Jemal

    Jemal Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,031
    Likes:
    60
    Dr. Deckoff-Jones posted a new blog that details the results Dr. Snyderman has achieved by treating his leukemia (and ME/CFS) with ARV's:

    More at:

    http://treatingxmrv.blogspot.com/2011/09/reason-for-hope.html
     
  2. Enid

    Enid Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,309
    Likes:
    841
    UK
    Thanks Jemal - a reason for hope indeed - one gets so tired of all the debunking of retroviruses by some still going on.
     
  3. eric_s

    eric_s Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,925
    Likes:
    73
    Switzerland/Spain (Valencia)
    Sorry if some people might not like that, but i will say what i think. News from Dr. Snyderman were anounced before the BWG results and now one day after the negative results we get them. It is one man and we have no way to know what exactly happens there. My interpretation is that they knew the BWG results would be negative and so they saved this story for today. I don't feel comfortable having to say this and i'm really not enjoying it, but i won't let anyone fool me. They had their chance to prove they are right and they failed. Why i don't know. I gave them the benefit of the doubt for a long time, because that question is so important and i want to be sure we get the correct answer, but now the ball is in their court as much as it can be.

    In my opinion they (the authors of positive studies and the people backing that hypothesis) now either have to admit they have been wrong or then challenge the BWG results. If they choose to challenge the BWG results i would think that's a courageous step and i would even be willing to help in any way i can for them to prove they are right, but i think first and foremost they should bear the costs themselves. But after this study it's them who now have to prove something. And for me it will take real proof, another blinded experiment where they (the lab) have no way of knowing who what sample is from. Anecdotal data and words don't change much for me anymore, very sorry for having to say that.
     
  4. Jemal

    Jemal Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,031
    Likes:
    60
    Has anything changed on that particular point, though? The ball has been in the court of the WPI and the scientists who published positive studies for a long time now (since the load of negative studies appeared).

    Someone already said it on this forum: the WPI has meant a lot so far for our disease. Like many I wouldn't even have registered on this forum if it weren't for them. So even though yesterday was a blow for many of us, I am still looking at the WPI for answers.
     
  5. eric_s

    eric_s Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,925
    Likes:
    73
    Switzerland/Spain (Valencia)
    I agree with what you've said in the first paragraph, but in my view, so far it was possible to say: It's all still very unsafe, a difficult, new virus, new assays, let's wait for more definitive answers. But now i honestly think their position can only still be justified if they can provide equally strong proof like the BWG phase III study.

    For me it was the same, it was the XMRV findings that have brought me here. That's a good thing, but now we need valid results and answers. And they don't come from just making a lot of noise without being able to back it up with robust data. So now that's what we need, robust data we can trust.

    Probably it doesn't make too much sense for me to say this again and again here, because i don't want to upset people who are already under enough stress (i'm in the same situation), but let's not fool ourselves, the only thing that can help us is serious, thorough investigation and after this i want the WPI to prove that this is what they are doing. Because we don't have resources and time to waste. We need hope, but it's pointless if we follow the ones who give us hope but can't bring us back better health. So we need to be sure they really are able to do that, at least that's how i see it.
     
    Sam Carter likes this.
  6. Daffodil

    Daffodil Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,924
    Likes:
    896
    FROM DR. MIKOVITS:


    body


    Sue
    There are XMRVs different strains, we know that now and have already found them..now we know why we have struggled because the sequence of the virus was incorrect..now we can sequence all the strains and find the right drugs for each one...there is more hope today than yesterday..not less..
     
  7. Jemal

    Jemal Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,031
    Likes:
    60
    Did she e-mail that?
     
  8. Daffodil

    Daffodil Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,924
    Likes:
    896
    yea. i usually never copy an email but this might make someone feel better
     
  9. Overstressed

    Overstressed Senior Member

    Messages:
    402
    Likes:
    126
    Belgium
    Hi Eric,

    it's good to remain sceptically, not to easily accept things. Only by asking questions, brings science further. It looks like everything has been answered, but I don't agree. People already mentioned the Hanson study, we have had the Fischer study, who just found XMRV easily in the throats of people. These are really good scientists, and perhaps they're wrong, but the good thing of all this, is that there's research ongoing, good people are looking at the virus, they're looking at the disease. I can not really speak of the lack of publicity the disease had, because I'm ill for only 4 years. But people who have been ill for a longer period of time, can better judge on that matter, but I think, the last two years, CFS/ME has got a lot of attention. Hopefully, it brings new research and new findings about the cause. I'm slightly a bit concerned that it will be put in the autoimmune basket and remains there forever. If you ask me personally, that is my greatest fear, to be classified as autoimmune. Why ? Like Jemal, I don't believe in that AI theory, the body attacking itself.

    Take care,
    OS.
     
  10. currer

    currer Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes:
    774
    Thanks for doing that daffodil.

    I still think the WPI are right. I am shocked that people dont support them more.

    People forget the science is still so new.
     
  11. currer

    currer Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes:
    774
    You could have an auto-immune disease developing from a retroviral infection.

    But the retrovirus would still be the CAUSE and this should not be glossed over. I think there will be a danger of this as retroviral involvement in human disease is threatening to the medical establishment.

    We may see a move to bury retroviral research in favour of immunological treatments. For example rheumatoid arthritis is treated with immune modulators, but a retrovirus has been a suspected cause of this disease for years.
     
  12. eric_s

    eric_s Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,925
    Likes:
    73
    Switzerland/Spain (Valencia)
    Thanks, OS. I also didn't buy what Dr. Levy said in the chat. I don't think it's so easy. But i'm not very afraid of that possibility you mentioned, because if they would really find something in the immune system they can treat and which makes people better, that would at least be a start. I don't think this would leave us stuck there, because it does not prohibit people from looking for the cause of the "autoimmune disease". I think it would probably bring in more funding and more researchers and they would get to the truth faster.

    Eric
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page