Review: 'Through the Shadowlands’ describes Julie Rehmeyer's ME/CFS Odyssey
I should note at the outset that this review is based on an audio version of the galleys and the epilogue from the finished work. Julie Rehmeyer sent me the final version as a PDF, but for some reason my text to voice software (Kurzweil) had issues with it. I understand that it is...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

'Nature' editorial on reproducibility - more demanding standards for research

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Simon, Apr 24, 2013.

  1. Simon

    Simon

    Messages:
    1,927
    Likes:
    14,578
    Monmouth, UK
    This whole reproducibility thing is really taking off:

    Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility (open access)
    Most of this looks really good, though it's a little worrying that a journal of Nature's standing feels the need to remind reviewers and authors that experiments need to adjust for multiple comparisons, or that data must meet the assumptions of the statistical test being applied (eg normal distribution).

    They also encourage a move to open data:
     
    alex3619 and jenbooks like this.
  2. Sean

    Sean Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,260
    Likes:
    18,001
    "encourage"?

    Should be an absolute obligatory not-even-up-for-debate minimum requirement for all peer review publications. There are no excuses for not publishing all data, and every reason for publishing. Anything less is a perverse joke.
     
    alex3619 likes this.
  3. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Hibernating

    Messages:
    4,616
    Likes:
    12,462
    South Australia
    Indeed. Lack of transparency is a big reason why these things persist.
     
    Sean likes this.
  4. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,641
    Likes:
    35,712
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    Transparency, accountability and governance issues were what my unfinished blog was to be about, which should have been finished in March. I may now have to substantially rewrite it, I have lost some of the material. These are issues I consider paramount in changing medicine for the better.
     
  5. Enid

    Enid Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,309
    Likes:
    860
    UK
    Strange - as a non scientist I I always believed transparency the very foundation of scientific enquiry (open) - if not non science.
     
    jenbooks likes this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page