Professor & patients' paper on the solvable biological challenge of ME/CFS: reader-friendly version
Simon McGrath provides a patient-friendly version of a peer-reviewed paper which highlights some of the most promising biomedical research on ME/CFS ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

'Nature' editorial on reproducibility - more demanding standards for research

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Simon, Apr 24, 2013.

  1. Simon

    Simon

    Messages:
    2,570
    Likes:
    15,778
    Monmouth, UK
    This whole reproducibility thing is really taking off:

    Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility (open access)
    Most of this looks really good, though it's a little worrying that a journal of Nature's standing feels the need to remind reviewers and authors that experiments need to adjust for multiple comparisons, or that data must meet the assumptions of the statistical test being applied (eg normal distribution).

    They also encourage a move to open data:
     
    alex3619 and jenbooks like this.
  2. Sean

    Sean Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,058
    Likes:
    16,293
    "encourage"?

    Should be an absolute obligatory not-even-up-for-debate minimum requirement for all peer review publications. There are no excuses for not publishing all data, and every reason for publishing. Anything less is a perverse joke.
     
    alex3619 likes this.
  3. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Hibernating

    Messages:
    4,524
    Likes:
    11,691
    South Australia
    Indeed. Lack of transparency is a big reason why these things persist.
     
    Sean likes this.
  4. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,115
    Likes:
    32,640
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    Transparency, accountability and governance issues were what my unfinished blog was to be about, which should have been finished in March. I may now have to substantially rewrite it, I have lost some of the material. These are issues I consider paramount in changing medicine for the better.
     
  5. Enid

    Enid Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,309
    Likes:
    858
    UK
    Strange - as a non scientist I I always believed transparency the very foundation of scientific enquiry (open) - if not non science.
     
    jenbooks likes this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page