AndyPR
Senior Member
- Messages
- 2,516
This would seem to indicate that it has changed over time
Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
Yes. a He. Not sure why I wrote Her.Pariante is a he, btw.
To include a 'broad cohort' confounds the findings and makes them meaningless. This was the whole point of the multiple 'chronic fatigue' wastebasket definitions. Some of the recent attempts to 'redefine' the disease looks at the history of muddled research of 'fatigue' and crafts a muddled definition exactly due to the inclusion of patient data who should have never been included. It is self-fulfilling, GIGO....
"For example, the Women’s Health Initiative—one of the largest of its kind—yielded few clear insights about diet and health. “The results were just confusing,” says Attia. “They spent $1 billion and couldn’t even prove that a low-fat diet is better or worse.” Attia’s nonprofit is trying to raise $190 million to answer these fundamental questions. But it’s hard to focus attention on the science of obesity, he says. “There’s just so much noise.”...
An overly broad cohort does exactly that, it introduces too much noise, it has too many variables, it allows cherry picking of results to spin a story around.
I don't think you missed anything - fundamental details are lacking.Perhaps I have missed it so please point me to the information if so.
A4ME has run with this with little or no input from the other CMRC memebers.
One only has to read their minutes at which they state they represent the CMRC etc. etc. and see the questions and statements CMRC members have made to realise that they couldn't have been involved in the decisions because they wouldn't be asking the question or taking the stance they have. Also, although not directly relevant but look at the branding. It's all branded A4ME. I thought it was fairly obvious but if you have doubt, asking the question of the other memebrs of the CMRC might be telling and perhaps wise? It's as if the other memberss have been pushed out out of the way in my opinion.Where did you get that from? If true, that would be extra worrying.
One only has to read their minutes at which they state they represent the CMRC etc. etc. and see the questions and statements CMRC members have made to realise that they couldn't have been involved in the decisions because they wouldn't be asking the question or taking the stance they have. Also, although not directly relevant but look at the branding. It's all branded A4ME. I thought it was fairly obvious but if you have doubt, asking the question of the other memebrs of the CMRC might be telling and perhaps wise? It's as if the other memberss have been pushed out out of the way in my opinion.
White has disappeared from the list, Collin/Collins is still there. So both were said to be retiring from the group, the one staying in an advisory role is taken off the list, the one changing universities is still there. I have every faith in this....MEGA petition said:MEGA is Prof George Davey-Smith, University of Bristol; Prof Chris Ponting, University of Edinburgh; Prof Colin Smith, University of Brighton; Prof Caroline Relton, University of Bristol; Tony Bartlett, Somalogic; Dr Rick Dunn, University of Birmingham; Prof Julia Newton, University of Newcastle; Sonya Chowdhury, Action for M.E., representing the patient charity members of the UK CFS/M.E. Research Collaborative Board; Prof Andrew Morris, University of Edinburgh; Dr Simon Collin, University of Bristol; Prof David Ford, Swansea University; Prof Esther Crawley, University of Bristol; Prof Paul Moss, University of Birmingham; Prof Jim Horne, Loughborough University; Prof Maria Fitzgerald, University College London; and Prof Paul Little, University of Southampton.
And Collin/Collins disappears.MEGA is Prof George Davey-Smith, University of Bristol; Prof Chris Ponting, University of Edinburgh; Prof Colin Smith, University of Brighton; Prof Caroline Relton, University of Bristol; Tony Bartlett, Somalogic; Dr Rick Dunn, University of Birmingham; Prof Julia Newton, University of Newcastle; Sonya Chowdhury, Action for M.E., representing the patient charity members of the UK CFS/M.E. Research Collaborative Board; Prof Andrew Morris, University of Edinburgh; Prof David Ford, Swansea University; Prof Esther Crawley, University of Bristol; Prof Paul Moss, University of Birmingham; Prof Jim Horne, Loughborough University; Prof Maria Fitzgerald, University College London; and Prof Paul Little, University of Southampton.
I have a suspicious mind and sometimes I wonder about the use of diversionary tactics. Someone has set a hare running and we are all dutifully following it. It has taken our minds right off PACE.
There seems to have been little good reason for the production of this petition at this time, especially as it was so badly underprepared. The public face of AFME does not seem capable of such deception, but who knows what the non public face is. I would not be at all surprised to find that this was standard operating procedure.