Severe ME Day of Understanding and Remembrance: Aug. 8, 2017
Determined to paper the Internet with articles about ME, Jody Smith brings some additional focus to Severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Day of Understanding and Remembrance on Aug. 8, 2017 ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

MEA hear back from NICE about the identity of ‘topic experts’ | 13 August 2017

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS News' started by Countrygirl, Aug 13, 2017.

  1. Countrygirl

    Countrygirl I'm with Cheesus

    Messages:
    2,844
    Likes:
    14,531
    UK
    http://www.meassociation.org.uk/201...the-identity-of-topic-experts-13-august-2017/

    Click on the link for the full article
     
  2. Cheesus

    Cheesus Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,186
    Likes:
    5,085
    UK
    Crawley.
     
  3. Jenny TipsforME

    Jenny TipsforME Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,124
    Likes:
    3,767
    Bristol
    -neurology (2), good relevant
    -psychiatry (3), irrelevant/biased perspective in this context
    -paediatrics (1), could be relevant but likely someone who is really psych too
    -patient representative (1) good to have patient voice but of course we have no idea how informed they are of the nature of research methods/neuroimmune type stuff, or why they were recruited

    So could be 5 out of 7 biased against advising full review :rolleyes:
     
  4. Countrygirl

    Countrygirl I'm with Cheesus

    Messages:
    2,844
    Likes:
    14,531
    UK
    (Naughty I know but in view of the suffering she inflicts on families and children................well deserved.
    [​IMG]
     
  5. user9876

    user9876 Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,582
    Likes:
    18,162
    moderated with many others
    They have clearly decided not to say to the ME association what they said to Tuller which is ME patients are too violent and dangerous to have the information - with the evidence for this being an article in the Guardian (previously dismissed by an information tribunal) and that some patients communicate and criticize NICE on forums of put in FoI requests (both our democratic rights). NICE essentially said to Tuller that if patients exercise their democratic rights to express their opinions and ask for information NICE will deem them dangerous and therefore not give the information. And of course in doing so NICE are adding stigma to patients.

    If I were a politician looking at NICE I would be asking for their head to explain or resign for the anti-democratic accountability and stigmatizing message they are giving.
     
  6. Research 1st

    Research 1st Severe ME, POTS & MCAS.

    Messages:
    695
    Likes:
    2,288
    It might be helpful to send NICE ME denial lobby a link to the American OMF youtube presentation on the latest biological CFS research, such as this:



    UK NICE representatives in between smoking cigars and paying someone to wash their Range Rover Sport may rhen take a causal look at the video screen and realize they had better pull their britches up, or get over taken by a superior American vehicle - honest Science.

    The current denial of ME as a form of functional somatic syndrome, is about to get exposed on a world scale, so it would be mindful for nice to very rapidly drop this concept of ME = CFS and CFS = CF psych, because otherwise we will have the ludicrous situation of American Scientists demonstrating a metabolic brain disease involving pathogens and autoimmunity, with a diagnostic test, with the British ME denial response of repeating the findings (in the UK fatigue clinics in patients who don't have ME) and repeating the old lie of ''we can't find abnormalities in two CFS clinics in London''.

    All patients will do if denied appropriate revisions of disease management is obtain the test, and sue NICE for dereliction of duty. So now is the time for NICE to live up to it's name and learn to be adult and stop being nasty.

    NICE should read the latest American research and accept that disease denial of ME will no longer work, because assays are being developed, in multiple counties, that cannot be explained away, and also will show that EXERCISE will worsen the abnormal findings, and this is critical to NICE, as NICE recommend GET which is harming patients at a cellular level.

    This cannot be tolerated ethically in terms of patient abuse in wider society, or at a professional academic level as it's dishonest to recommend GET at this point in time, now the research has advanced.
     
  7. Esther12

    Esther12

    Messages:
    8,449
    Likes:
    28,507
    I wouldn't assume UK neurology is good.
     
  8. Countrygirl

    Countrygirl I'm with Cheesus

    Messages:
    2,844
    Likes:
    14,531
    UK
    I have always understood that neurologists are the greatest atheists of all the specialities when confronted with a case of ME. As stated by a doctor in our county hospital: 'I don't believe in ME', ......as though it is some article of faith...................and neurologists are particularly fervent unbelievers.
     
  9. cornwall13

    cornwall13

    Messages:
    39
    Likes:
    183
    Just an idea, but is it possible to request a FOI on how they came to their decision. They must have made a report on the decision they made?
     
  10. Learner1

    Learner1 Professional Patient

    Messages:
    848
    Likes:
    1,355
    Pacific Northwest
    Isn't there anyone in the UK media who covers scandals? After what I heard at the OMF Symposium yesterday, its impossible to come away believing NICE's position.

    Its scandalous that there's no immunologist on the committee.

    I had a nice chat with Cindy Bateman at the Symposium yesterday. She is passionate about training doctors about how to diagnose and treat patients. You should be demanding that your NHS send some doctors out to Salt Lake City to be in her first class, or bring her to the UK to teach them.
     
  11. Valentijn

    Valentijn WE ARE KINA

    Messages:
    14,281
    Likes:
    45,792
    Richard Grunewald, the neurologist running a project for NICE to create a doctor's guide for Suspected Neurological Conditions, is a blatant ME-denialist. Statements made in the document, which reflect a consensus including several other neurologists, would indicate that the ones involved with NICE seem to be a rather rotten bunch.

    A couple excerpts:
    I now have absolutely no faith in NICE to honestly and openly carry out its appointed functions.
     
    Stretched, Solstice, AndyPR and 12 others like this.
  12. Sbag

    Sbag

    Messages:
    65
    Likes:
    308
    The original list of people on the guideline committee can be seen here https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg53/chapter/Appendix-A-The-Guideline-Development-Group

    Nice told me that Topic experts and members of the original guideline committee are asked for their opinion. So it would be ok to presume that some of the original list are part of this process. Of the original list there are 2 paediatricians ( Esther Crawley, David Vickers), 1 neurologist (Dr Richard Grünewald), 1 psychiatrist (Dr Alastair Santhouse), 3 patient representatives (see link for names).
    They will of course be using different people on their expert panel but if any of the original members were helping then I assume it would be people listed in brackets.

    Interestingly they have upped the number of psychiatrists that were consulted in the initial group from 1 to 3, there is a psychologist on the original list but I assume they would have listed this separately.

    Interesting fact no 2 - Dr Richard Grünewald, Consultant Neurologist, Sheffield is the chair of another guideline committee which is currently in consultation - the one on Suspected Neurological Conditions. If you go and look at the information for this consultation there is a huge discrepancy in the data available https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/indevelopment/gid-cgwave0800/documents :
    • There is a document which lists the current committee members
    • the minutes from meetings in recent years are available
    Looking through the comments from stakeholders for this guideline there is a lot of input from fibromyalgia groups saying that it should be included.

    Have a look at the info and you can make your own assumptions on who the neurologist is for the ME group and who else might be involved.
     
  13. Aurator

    Aurator Senior Member

    Messages:
    625
    Likes:
    3,077
    "However we consider that the names are exempt from disclosure under 2 sections of the Freedom of Information Act."

    Has Dr Shepherd or anyone else been told what two sections specifically NICE are claiming exemption from disclosure under? It would be useful to know that at least. Or do we have to make a FOI request even to know that?

    "The findings of the check on the need for an update are discussed with topic experts. All proposals go through an internal validation process before submission to Guidance Executive. It is Guidance Executive that takes the decision to update the guidance or not."


    Not that this way of doing things is remotely incestuous, you understand.

    I think we already know what NICE's final decision on the matter will be.

    FOI requests to NICE need to continue to be made all the more insistently. They exist precisely to safeguard against this kind of autocratic unaccountability.
     
  14. Sbag

    Sbag

    Messages:
    65
    Likes:
    308
    FOI requests to NICE need to continue to be made all the more insistently. They exist precisely to safeguard against this kind of autocratic unaccountability.[/QUOTE]

    Looking through the NICE board meeting minutes the number of FOI requests get reported to them. If there is a huge increase then it might raise the awareness level to them if they aren't taking any of the letters sent to them seriously
     
    Skycloud, Hutan and Jan like this.
  15. Cheesus

    Cheesus Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,186
    Likes:
    5,085
    UK
    That is exactly what a neurologist said to me only a couple of weeks ago. He then went on to tell me I had no organic disease. This was at the start of the appointment. He hadn't examined me and nor had I spoken.
     
  16. Wonko

    Wonko Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,422
    Likes:
    4,622
    The other side.
    Think of the savings the NHS will realise from having Kryptonians working in departments, no more need for imaging equipment etc.

    Of course he may have just been an arrogant git but what are the chances of that?
     
  17. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet

    Messages:
    1,478
    Likes:
    7,560
    Yep,they are mostly a waste of time. Egos too big you see, they can't see past there enormous self importance or even bother to be up to date in research in their field. Why would they need to stay ahead of their field when most people don't understand it. Far easier to BS their way through and have an easy life.

    I apologise in advance to any genuinely good neurologists out there. So far out of the 8 I have received treatment from they have all been arrogant pricks and at least half of them with accompanying sadistic tendencies. :nervous:
     
  18. Valentijn

    Valentijn WE ARE KINA

    Messages:
    14,281
    Likes:
    45,792
    Yes, it's funny how they don't believe in ME, but fully believe that the diagnosis of ME (nothing) is the correct one.
     
  19. Hilary

    Hilary Senior Member

    Messages:
    190
    Likes:
    1,059
    UK
    NICE couldn't be a less appropriate acronym. NASTY would seem more suitable.... (not available so treat yourself...)
     
  20. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet

    Messages:
    1,478
    Likes:
    7,560
    Never
    Achieving
    Satisfactory
    Treatment
    Yuck

    Sorry y is tricky
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page