I have a question, We have (19?) which ever the numbers of doctors listed as main writers of PACE and one paper, Vs 2k+ papers on the physiological abnormalities of CFS/ME. And at least I can list 50+ specialist doctors (going by the signatures against the IOM) but if we add the ones that did not sign we should go up to 100+ that treat cfs with its all physiological abnormalities. How in such a proportionate number is the view still psychological, what does it take to switch? If I had a blog I would investigate this question. I would love for one of the very good writers to tackle this question. I know is not an easy answer but how do we change the perception in the medical community. What will it take. Like we need a gap analysis so we can move forward.