• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Mainstream medics struggling to explain CHELATION trial result!! :)

natasa778

Senior Member
Messages
1,774
Absolutely hilarious how they are obviously very very uncomfortable with the results of this trial and now bickering like kids – one could speculate that the trial was originally funded/instigated with the intent of disproving this 'dangerous alternative practice'. But the results backfired on them :)

(btw I am convinced that effects are linked to regulating effects of chelating agents on calcium metabolism in/around the heart, but that is not really relevant – what is relevant is the slapstick pie in the mainstream face :)



Medpage today, 11 March

Note that this study was published as an abstract and presented at a conference. These data and conclusions should be considered to be preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

SAN FRANCISCO -- Vitamins alone won't improve outcomes for patients who've had a heart attack, but they do appear to have additive benefits when given in conjunction with chelation therapy, researchers reported here.

In further analyses of the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT), MI patients who had both high-dose vitamins and chelation therapy were significantly less likely to reach a combined cardiovascular endpoint over 5 years than those who had placebo in both instances, Gervasio Lamas, MD, of Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, Fla., reported during a late-breaking clinical trials session at the American College of Cardiology meeting here.

"The message here, I think, is a cautious one," Lamas said. "We've moved something that has been an alternative medicine into perhaps the realm of scientific inquiry, and found some unexpected results that merit further research."

But he warned that he doesn't think the "results of any single trial are enough to carry this novel hypothesis into daily use for patients who've had acute MI."

However, Magnus Ohman, MD, of Duke University Medical Center, noted that the trial was well-designed and had a clear outcome: "We have a 2-by-2 factorial design, we have a significant reduction with vitamins and chelation versus placebo-placebo, yet your conclusion is, 'maybe not.'"

"So I'm wondering," he continued, "if we do a trial and we have an endpoint that is unusual and is a statistically significant finding, why are you holding back?"

Ohman told MedPage Today he wouldn't necessarily recommend chelation therapy to his patients at Duke University, but if they told him they were going to try it, he wouldn't discourage them.

When it was presented at the American Heart Association meeting last fall, the TACT trial showed that chelation therapy reduced a composite cardiovascular endpoint in patients who've had an MI -- a finding that was surprising to all and unsettling to many cardiologists, who had been dismissive of chelation.

But most chelation practitioners will use concurrent high doses of anti-oxidant vitamins and minerals in conjunction with chelation. To rule out this potential confounding, the trial was conducted in a 2-by-2 factorial fashion, in which once patients were randomized to either the therapy or placebo, they were also randomized to either vitamins (3 high-dose capsules per day) or placebo.

The TACT Vitamin trial enrolled the full 1,708 patients and assessed the same primary composite endpoint of time to first occurrence of either death, MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for angina.

Overall, Lamas and colleagues found no difference between those on vitamins or those on placebo in terms of the primary endpoint (37% in placebo group versus 34% in high-dose vitamin group), and there were no significant differences in any individual components of the primary endpoint.

But when looking at all four groups, they found that those who had chelation and vitamins had a significantly reduced risk of the primary endpoint compared with those who had placebo in both instances (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95, P=0.016).

Lamas said the mechanisms by which a combination of high-dose vitamins and chelation therapy might benefit these patients are unclear, but are deserving of further research.

During the session, he equated the results to those from a phase I or II randomized controlled trial, and that the idea of chelation therapy and vitamins "has now become, I think based on TACT, a novel hypothesis."

"It might give us a little window into a mechanism that we have not previously thought of," Lamas said, cautioning, however, that "we are far from carrying this novel hypothesis and applying it to patients."
 

ukxmrv

Senior Member
Messages
4,413
Location
London
Natasha, did they say what the chelation therapy consisted of?

(very interesting, thanks for posting this!)
 

natasa778

Senior Member
Messages
1,774
No I don't think they gave details, study will be published shortly hopefully with full details