The Power and Pitfalls of Omics: George Davey Smith’s storming talk at ME/CFS conference
Read about the talk that stole the show at a recent ME/CFS conference in Simon McGrath's two-part blog.
Discuss the article on the Forums.

look how the Reeves definition and the CDC can skewer results

Discussion in 'Latest ME/CFS Research' started by leelaplay, Mar 22, 2010.

  1. leelaplay

    leelaplay member

    Messages:
    1,542
    Likes:
    117
    Tom Kindlon posted this to co-cure today.

    Small piece in British Medical Journal (BMJ) June 2009

    [tk:These are the results of a CDC study that used the empiric criteria (Reeves, 2005) for CFS]

    [if: how very frightening - take a disease, establish a new criteria that includes psychiatric illness and excludes elements of the disease itself, then call for psychiatric treatment]

    Published 19 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2496
    Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2496

    Minerva

    High rates of psychiatric disturbances are reported in studies of chronic
    fatigue syndrome (CFS). Researchers wonder if this pattern reflects referral
    bias rather than true co-morbidity.

    In a study in Psychosomatic Medicine (2009;71:557-65, doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e31819ea179),
    57% of patients with CFS had at least one current psychiatric diagnosis, and 89% at least one
    lifetime psychiatric diagnosis, compared with 45% and 79% in people with
    subsyndromic CFS-like illness. Most patients with psychiatric co-morbidity
    had not sought help during the previous six months.

    The findings suggest there's an urgent need to address psychiatric disorders when caring for
    patients with CFS.

    ===============================================================
    Don't support the Reeves/empirical definition/criteria for CFS?
    Sign the petition at: http://CFSdefinitionpetition.notlong.com
    ===============================================================
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page