• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Lombardi et al 2011 - cytokine signature in CFS

omerbasket

Senior Member
Messages
510
Has anyone had their cytokines tested at the WPI or VIPdx and also at Klimas lab? That would be interesting. I have had mine tested at VIPdx multiple times. They vary a lot, but if there is one that I can count on being elevated and abnormal it is IL-8.
Have you been tested for XMRV? If so - have you been found to be positive or negative?
 

oceanblue

Guest
Messages
1,383
Location
UK
I've found a recent paper on methodological issues in cytokine studies which suggests the sampling conditions in this study were far from ideal. It recommends that when taking blood for subsequent cytokine analysis, blood should be drawn into chilled tubes
For plasma samples, whole blood should be collected in sterile tubes with anticoagulants, placed on ice immediately, and spun down as soon as possible, preferably within 30 minutes. Many cytokines have a shortlived life and begin to degrade once drawn.

By contrast, this paper says blood was processed within 6 hours, which seems very slow - and makes no mention of ice and at room temperature cytokine degradation would be even faster.
 

acer2000

Senior Member
Messages
818
I've found a recent paper on methodological issues in cytokine studies which suggests the sampling conditions in this study were far from ideal. It recommends that when taking blood for subsequent cytokine analysis, blood should be drawn into chilled tubes

By contrast, this paper says blood was processed within 6 hours, which seems very slow - and makes no mention of ice and at room temperature cytokine degradation would be even faster.

That might well be true and important, but the main finding of this paper was that patients with CFS symptoms and who also tested positive for XMRV had profoundly elevated IL-8. If the study you cite suggests that cytokines degrade if not processed immediately, wouldn't that suggest that the levels reported in that paper are actually too low instead of the other way around?

Its probably more complicated than that... and might be different for each cytokine.
 

oceanblue

Guest
Messages
1,383
Location
UK
That might well be true and important, but the main finding of this paper was that patients with CFS symptoms and who also tested positive for XMRV had profoundly elevated IL-8. If the study you cite suggests that cytokines degrade if not processed immediately, wouldn't that suggest that the levels reported in that paper are actually too low instead of the other way around?

Its probably more complicated than that... and might be different for each cytokine.
It suggests to me that if you haven't treated your initial sample properly then everything else that follows is questionable - it's also possible that while the blood sample is sitting around for hours other processes are going on releasing cytokines into the blood which would no longer represent normal circulating cytokines levels. And unlike the Klmas study they didn't sample in the morning, another recommendation for consistent data. I don't understand why they didn't follow these basics.
 

RedRuth

Senior Member
Messages
143
.......................we measured cytokine and chemokine values in the plasma of XMRV-infected CFS patients and compared these data to those of healthy controls.

Did they only do CFS positive vs healthy? Surely this has nothing to do with XMRV unless they did a CFS positive XMRV negative control?
 

jace

Off the fence
Messages
856
Location
England
Why does that make a difference? They were not trying to tease out subsets, but rather looking at the difference between XMRV+ ME patients and healthy controls.

I came across this
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/8/1

Ginger extract inhibits LPS induced macrophage activation and function

Sudipta Tripathi email, David Bruch email and Dilip S Kittur email

Dept of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2008, 8:1doi:10.1186/1472-6882-8-1
Published: 3 January 2008

Macrophages play a dual role in host defence. They act as the first line of defence by mounting an inflammatory response to antigen exposure and also act as antigen presenting cells and initiate the adaptive immune response. They are also the primary infiltrating cells at the site of inflammation. Inhibition of macrophage activation is one of the possible approaches towards modulating inflammation. Both conventional and alternative approaches are being studied in this regard. Ginger, an herbal product with broad anti inflammatory actions, is used as an alternative medicine in a number of inflammatory conditions like rheumatic disorders. In the present study we examined the effect of ginger extract on macrophage activation in the presence of LPS stimulation.

Results

We observed that ginger extract inhibited IL-12, TNF-?, IL-1? (pro inflammatory cytokines) and RANTES, MCP-1 (pro inflammatory chemokines) production in LPS stimulated macrophages. Ginger extract also down regulated the expression of B7.1, B7.2 and MHC class II molecules. In addition ginger extract negatively affected the antigen presenting function of macrophages and we observed a significant reduction in T cell proliferation in response to allostimulation, when ginger extract treated macrophages were used as APCs. A significant decrease in IFN-? and IL-2 production by T cells in response to allostimulation was also observed.

Conclusion

In conclusion ginger extract inhibits macrophage activation and APC function and indirectly inhibits T cell activation.

Now ME is thought to be (in part) a disregulation of the immune system, and Encephalomyelitis means an inflammation of the brain and spinal chord. In Lombardi et al, the cytokines that they found to be specifically uprated were

Table II. Plasma cytokine and chemokine values of patients and controls given in pg/mL. Significance is at the 99% C.I. by the Students t-test of the log-transformed data.
Protein Patients N=118
Mean (S.E.) (pg/mL)
Controls Significance N=138 P-value
Mean (S.E.) (pg/mL)
Up-regulated
IL-8
MIP-1?
MIP-1?
TNF-?
IL-6
IL-2
IP-10
Eotaxin
IL-12
MCP-1
Rantes

I have bolded the ones that are mentioned in the macrophage study. Quite a clear correlation. Ginger tea, anyone?
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
A warning on ginger

Hi, be very very wary of ginger. I tried it many years ago (1997?), and at very high doses all my ME or CFS fatigue disappeared. Entirely. Great, I found it! Not so.

Every three days it started to lose effect. Every three days I had to double the dose. 100g per day became 200g, then 400g (yes, grams). At about the point that 400g was failing I realized that this was not going to work. Something was increasing the severity of the illness in response to ginger. I stopped taking it. Within a day or two I crashed, badly. I do not recommend the experience.

On the removal of fatigue, there was some core of something that was not fatigue, something did not feel right - some kind of malaise that is hard to describe. It certainly was not a panacea. What it did do was for that short time it allowed me to expend effort to real exhaustion - real fatigue - something that I never experience with my illness because the post exertional relapse gets me before I can get that bad. I walked many miles for the first time in years, and was active all day long - until the crash.

I have not written about this before because I knew some would try it. Be very very careful.

Oh, and my friends were complaining they could smell me before they saw me - that much ginger gets noticed.

Bye
Alex
 

RedRuth

Senior Member
Messages
143
Why does that make a difference? They were not trying to tease out subsets, but rather looking at the difference between XMRV+ ME patients and healthy controls.

Because it doesn't tell you anything about XMRV only about CFS sufferers. They can only say that the effect on cytokine levels is due to CFS not XMRV, unless they do the proper controls. The possible XMRV status of the patients is irrelevant unless they have a +CFS -XMRV group. It should really be called Chronic Fatigue Syndrome reveals a distinct inflammatory signature.
 

lansbergen

Senior Member
Messages
2,512
Conclusion

In conclusion ginger extract inhibits macrophage activation and APC function and indirectly inhibits T cell activation.

I do not want inhibition of macrophages and T cells activation.

I try to get them doing their jobs again.
 

oceanblue

Guest
Messages
1,383
Location
UK
Could you check how it was done in other cytokine studies? Like the ones where Dr. Klimas participated, for example?
There are many ways of measuring cytokines (eg choose testing of plasma, serum, unstimulated PBMCs or stimulated PCMCs) and no one agrees what's best. The recent Brenu study even looked at cytokine mRNA/gene expression rather than protein leves. Closest comparison is with the Klimas study which like this one looked at plasma but processed blood within 2 hours - which is a lot better than the 8 hours that applies here but still substantially short of ideal. The Klimas study also had the advantages of only looking at women (cytokine levels vary by gender so you get a clearer picture by only looking at men, or women), and measuring cytokines in the morning (best time to do it). However, the Klimas sample was quite a lot smaller.

Basically, there are no ideal studies. Until there are, it may be that the differences seen between studies are primarily down to methodology. Though it's worth noting that even for Rheumatoid Arthritis, an illness where there is a known role for cytokines (specifially TNF-alpha), they can't pin down a specific cytokine profile.

So cytokines are hard to pin down anyway - and if the testing is sub-optimal then it's likely to be impossible.

Another key factor is changes in the same individual over time (cytokine levels are so hard to pin down). Apparently Klimas & Fletcher are looking at repeated sample from the same individuals over time. Will be interesting to see this data in due course.