• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Humans differ in their personal microbial cloud

MeSci

ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?
Messages
8,231
Location
Cornwall, UK
Not surprising, perhaps, apart from the quantity and extent!

Maybe don't read if you are 'germ phobic'.
Humans differ in their personal microbial cloud

James F. Meadow1,2, Adam E. Altrichter1,2, Ashley C. Bateman1,2, Jason Stenson1,3, GZ Brown1,3, Jessica L. Green1,2,4, Brendan J.M. Bohannan1,2

1Biology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
2Department of Biology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
3Department of Architecture, Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
4Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA

Published 2015-09-22

Abstract


Dispersal of microbes between humans and the built environment can occur through direct contact with surfaces or through airborne release; the latter mechanism remains poorly understood. Humans emit upwards of 106 biological particles per hour, and have long been known to transmit pathogens to other individuals and to indoor surfaces. However it has not previously been demonstrated that humans emit a detectible microbial cloud into surrounding indoor air, nor whether such clouds are sufficiently differentiated to allow the identification of individual occupants. We used high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes to characterize the airborne bacterial contribution of a single person sitting in a sanitized custom experimental climate chamber. We compared that to air sampled in an adjacent, identical, unoccupied chamber, as well as to supply and exhaust air sources. Additionally, we assessed microbial communities in settled particles surrounding each occupant, to investigate the potential long-term fate of airborne microbial emissions. Most occupants could be clearly detected by their airborne bacterial emissions, as well as their contribution to settled particles, within 1.5–4 h. Bacterial clouds from theoccupants were statistically distinct, allowing the identification of some individual occupants. Our results confirm that an occupied space is microbially distinct from an unoccupied one, and demonstrate for the first time that individuals release their own personalized microbial cloud.

Full text here
 
Last edited:

sarah darwins

Senior Member
Messages
2,508
Location
Cornwall, UK
So, a matter of time before we're being identified by our personal microbial cloudprint!

On the plus side, I wonder if there may be diagnostic uses for this one day, maybe paving the way for a Star Trek style 'scanner'.