Discussion in 'Latest ME/CFS Research' started by Dolphin, Jan 4, 2015.
(Not open access) http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.12677/abstract
Can't say I found this particularly exciting.
An annoying thing is what is practised was compared with:
These are guidelines that are not popular with a lot of patients. They basically take the biopsychosocial view of the illness, recommending CBT and GET, etc.
This extract gives an idea where they're coming from:
They do sort of recommend GET as they say it is recommended in current guidelines in Table 6 when listing therapies (slightly oddly CBT isn't marked as such even though they recommend it a few times in the text). "Diet changes/nutritional advice" and "Bed rest" are the two other approaches in Table 6 that they report some clinicians used but which are not recommended by current guidelines (they don't recommend them either).
They don't really talk about biopsychosocial explanations explicitly but as I say they promote CBT and GET.
Kathy Rowe (one of the authors) seems to be popular with one or more ME/CFS groups in Australia but I would be concerned if she became too influential esp. in the care of adults. Her approach seems to be mainly about management and CBT-lite. She generally doesn't seem to talk much about physical findings or drugs aimed at dealing with causes. A lot of children get better anyway if they get diagnosed and are not pushed too hard which is probably why her results are reasonable. However, I imagine the same approach would be far less effective e.g. one would see far fewer people getting back to good functioning with adults.
Thanks @Dolphin .For anyone that is interested in paedriatic ME/CFS this thread may add something.
Thank you for digging into this for us!
At the IACFS/ME conference in March 2014, they spoke about this study:
You can also try a Google Site Search
Separate names with a comma.