Cheshire
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,129
A few more articles from France, whose coverage has been quite important. But of the 3 main newspapers (Le Figaro, conservative, Le Monde and Libération (left wing), only Le Figaro wrote something).
(Le Parisien, altough important, is not a national newspaper; it's the local newspaper of Paris and suburbs.)
http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/201...ie-biologique-et-non-psychologique-etude.html
These two ones have a slight journalist approach, and interviewed French "experts"
http://www.pourquoidocteur.fr/Fatigue-chronique---une-origine-biologique--9943.html
http://sante.lefigaro.fr/actualite/2015/03/05/23474-difficile-diagnostic-fatigue-chronique
An extract of the later (google translate)
Doctor in internal medicine Laurent Chiche, is skeptical about the value of this work. " The differences between patients may be due to chance , and their statistics are not very strong. If there actually are differences, they must be confirmed by another team, another sample of patients. " Professor Jean- Dominique De Korwin , scientific advisor to the French Association of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome , judge these interesting research, but is skeptical about the proposed treatment , "Some of the cited molecules are already used for other conditions, without effect on fatigue. The research must continue: we must now follow patients over several years to see how the disease actually develops after three year"
And from Canada (Québec)
http://www.psychomedia.qc.ca/syndro...-02-11/nouveaux-criteres-diagnostiques-et-nom
http://www.lapresse.ca/vivre/sante/...eau-nom-reclame-pour-la-fatigue-chronique.php
(Le Parisien, altough important, is not a national newspaper; it's the local newspaper of Paris and suburbs.)
http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/201...ie-biologique-et-non-psychologique-etude.html
These two ones have a slight journalist approach, and interviewed French "experts"
http://www.pourquoidocteur.fr/Fatigue-chronique---une-origine-biologique--9943.html
http://sante.lefigaro.fr/actualite/2015/03/05/23474-difficile-diagnostic-fatigue-chronique
An extract of the later (google translate)
Doctor in internal medicine Laurent Chiche, is skeptical about the value of this work. " The differences between patients may be due to chance , and their statistics are not very strong. If there actually are differences, they must be confirmed by another team, another sample of patients. " Professor Jean- Dominique De Korwin , scientific advisor to the French Association of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome , judge these interesting research, but is skeptical about the proposed treatment , "Some of the cited molecules are already used for other conditions, without effect on fatigue. The research must continue: we must now follow patients over several years to see how the disease actually develops after three year"
And from Canada (Québec)
http://www.psychomedia.qc.ca/syndro...-02-11/nouveaux-criteres-diagnostiques-et-nom
http://www.lapresse.ca/vivre/sante/...eau-nom-reclame-pour-la-fatigue-chronique.php