MEAdvocacy.org Update and a Call for Continued Support
“I have tried raising money by asking for it, and by not asking for it. I always got more by asking for it.”
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Haukeland Rituximab follow-up study, 21 July 2013: "even higher rates of effect"

Discussion in 'Latest ME/CFS Research' started by Sasha, Jul 22, 2013.

  1. Firestormm

    Firestormm Guest

    Messages:
    5,823
    Likes:
    5,983
    Cornwall England
    I agree. I am not happy at the thought that a drug like this might be 'thrown' at anyone and everyone with this diagnosis - especially this diagnosis - on a 'sink or swim' basis. I am sure it won't be but very little has yet to be forthcoming from the original authors about why they think those that responded did so. It is a critical nut to crack. If ME is to be established firmly as an autoimmune condition then it must be better explained. Hopefully, this is what will come out of the next publication. Hopefully it won't simply be a repeat of the first. Although a repeat would be nice but you see what I mean :)
     
  2. MeSci

    MeSci ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6

    Messages:
    4,864
    Likes:
    5,983
    Cornwall, UK
    I've seen studies where they use the same people as both control and treatment groups, by first following their progress without treatment, and then with, and sometimes again without. Obviously with an illness with so much natural variability as ours, this would be relatively difficult, at least without using objective measurements to determine and match the stage of the illness with and without treatment.
     
  3. Kate_UK

    Kate_UK Senior Member

    Messages:
    234
    Likes:
    236
    Roy S and Bob like this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page