Review: 'Through the Shadowlands’ describes Julie Rehmeyer's ME/CFS Odyssey
I should note at the outset that this review is based on an audio version of the galleys and the epilogue from the finished work. Julie Rehmeyer sent me the final version as a PDF, but for some reason my text to voice software (Kurzweil) had issues with it. I understand that it is...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Half a billion for 'talking therapies'?

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Jonathan Edwards, Jul 31, 2017.

  1. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards "Gibberish"

    Messages:
    5,227
    Likes:
    31,869
    It seems that Mr Jeremy Hunt, the UK health minister, has announced a further £1.3B for mental health staff. People are already saying the figures do not add up but it looks as if half of this is going on psychotherapist salaries for 'talking therapies'. See https://www.theguardian.com/society...xed-response-to-13bn-plan-for-better-services

    I think this indicates the scale of the vested interest in psychotherapy that lies behind PACE. OK, talking therapy might be useful for psychiatric illnesses like depression, but I am about as sceptical about use of therapists there as I am for ME in fact. The problem is actually lack of medical and nursing staff.
     
    merylg, Mary, suseq and 51 others like this.
  2. Kati

    Kati Patient in training

    Messages:
    5,460
    Likes:
    19,545
    Could this have to do with whom is President of the Royal College of Psychiatrists (wessely)?
     
    Luther Blissett, lilpink and GreyOwl like this.
  3. AndyPR

    AndyPR RIP PR :'(

    Coverage on this from the BBC
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40752060

    Given Hunt's stated aim to "end the "historic imbalance" between mental and physical health services.", his plan becomes clear now. Under fund the physical health services until the funding balances with mental health services...

    From the Guardian article
    So yet more smoke and mirrors from our lovely Tory government. This announcement is using funds previously announced, so while it looks like new money is being invested it's not, and it won't fully address the fall in staffing numbers that they caused in the first place.
     
    Mary, suseq, Luther Blissett and 15 others like this.
  4. Skippa

    Skippa Anti-BS

    Messages:
    841
    Likes:
    2,960
    This is the deflection/distraction.

    Kinda knew something would crop up to grab the limelight.
     
  5. TiredSam

    TiredSam The wise nematode hibernates

    Messages:
    2,677
    Likes:
    21,535
    Germany
    This from the Guardian makes me feel very uneasy. Are we all to be sent to occupational therapists with a leaflet so they can say "look, we're treating and extra 1 million people"? For M.E. sufferers "properly integrate mental and physical health services" has meant "improperly substitute mental for physical health services", and I'd like to see a lot less of it.

    "We are spending 1.3 billion on mental health" is another way of saying "some people are going to be earning 1.3 billion from mental health" - a little transparency on who's cashing in and what for wouldn't come amiss.

    And the fact that sums of this size are available for talk therapy whilst biomedical research into M.E. gets nothing is a (insert expletive of choice here) disgrace.
     
  6. adreno

    adreno PR activist

    Messages:
    4,843
    Likes:
    11,018
    We don't need more talk therapy. We need to figure out the biological basis of so-called "mental" health issues. Terming a disorder "mental" really just means that we don't understand what it is. It's only one step up from calling it possession. Talk therapy is really just a modern form of exorcism. No wonder it was invented in the West, with its Christian history.
     
  7. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards "Gibberish"

    Messages:
    5,227
    Likes:
    31,869
    I could not possibly comment.

    Er, yes, that was my reading.
     
  8. Cheshire

    Cheshire Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,121
    Likes:
    8,993
    This tells more about the fact that some health care professionals think they are indispensable than about mental health needs.



    No, not anyone, Simon.
     
  9. Marco

    Marco Grrrrrrr!

    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes:
    3,167
    Near Cognac, France
    This was always my fear with the recent focus on treating mental illnesses. That the CBT 'cure-all' pyramid scheme would be wheeled out as a ready made quick fix.
     
  10. wastwater

    wastwater Senior Member

    Messages:
    940
    Likes:
    637
    uk
    I think therapy is over valued for so called psychiatric illness
     
  11. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet Moderated, no explanation given

    Messages:
    1,478
    Likes:
    7,571
    I wonder what they will do next? .....make out that colds and gi infections or arthritis are psychosomatic? I wish they would just get real and stop playing their silly games.

    Just seems totally transparent to me that the NIce review, the rise of MUS centers, closure of vital units in our teaching hospitals, Brexit, are all bringing us to a point where they will destroy the health service and irradiate the care element completely.

    I know the numbers don't stack up with low taxes and an aging population but is this really a viable answer? It's shallow thinking at its very very worst.
     
  12. TiredSam

    TiredSam The wise nematode hibernates

    Messages:
    2,677
    Likes:
    21,535
    Germany
    upload_2017-7-31_10-22-6.png

    MI is a heart attack for anyone who, like me, thought for one horrible moment that he was trying to get an acronym for "mental illness" into common usage by listing it with two of the most common killers. I must be getting paranoid.

    A 10 yr plan should see him nicely into retirement.
     
  13. Skippa

    Skippa Anti-BS

    Messages:
    841
    Likes:
    2,960
    Jeez... hi future human beings studying this crazy period of social history!

    Sorry we couldn't prevent this cluster fuck, not all people of this period bought into it.

    Might I refer you to leeches and bloodletting for more "quackery of history".

    Those who don't learn from their history...
     
  14. Skippa

    Skippa Anti-BS

    Messages:
    841
    Likes:
    2,960
    I thought it was a typo for ME.

    I know people who had a myocardial infarction who didn't then need to see a shrink.

    WTF?

    It (mental intervention) starts as an adjunctive to traditional medication, I wonder how long before patients can ONLY get mental help for cancer??

    Absurd.
     
  15. lilpink

    lilpink Senior Member

    Messages:
    863
    Likes:
    5,449
    UK
    Big YEP! :bang-head:
     
  16. A.B.

    A.B. Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,751
    Likes:
    23,188
    Code for "psychologize every difficult problem and abandon the patient while offering psychotherapy just so you can avoid the accusation of abandoning the patient".
     
    cfs6691, Valentijn, helios and 13 others like this.
  17. Wonko

    Wonko Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,439
    Likes:
    4,742
    The other side.
    Dunno...I know of one house in England with 650 people in it, the majority of whom appear to have serious mental health problems, or so the evidence would suggest.
     
  18. Forbin

    Forbin Senior Member

    Messages:
    949
    Likes:
    3,982
    I don't see this turning out well in the long run...

     
  19. Sean

    Sean Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,257
    Likes:
    17,984
    Yeah, excuse me if my cynicism alarm is ringing off the wall.

    If anybody was in any doubt that the problem we are dealing with is (and long has been) primarily a political one, not a scientific one, this madness should dispel any remaining doubts. Actual science simply doesn't count anymore in these decisions and policies. It is all now just a pseudo-scientific band-aid excuse to deny proper healthcare to millions, and then blame them for not getting any benefit from the madness.

    Parity in funding between physical and mental health, independent of the effectiveness and relevance of the latter's interventions is a completely arbitrary and bogus benchmark, indicating nothing more than the degree to which the healthcare system has been corrupted by money, ideology, and pseudo-science.

    Anybody want to bet that there will be no meaningful measures of how 'successful' this program is?

    The most important question now for patients in the UK is how far the alternative government (Corbyn Labour) has been sucked into this cesspit.

    Anybody has any close contacts with senior Labour people, now is a good time to try setting the record straight for them. If they fall for this madness then it is all over for UK patients, which will not help the rest of us either.
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2017
  20. adreno

    adreno PR activist

    Messages:
    4,843
    Likes:
    11,018
    Yep.
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page