Severe ME Day of Understanding and Remembrance: Aug. 8, 2017
Determined to paper the Internet with articles about ME, Jody Smith brings some additional focus to Severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Day of Understanding and Remembrance on Aug. 8, 2017 ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

good news clip of judy m explaining how we get sick from xmrv

Discussion in 'Media, Interviews, Blogs, Talks, Events about XMRV' started by Rrrr, Jun 28, 2010.

  1. Rrrr

    Rrrr Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,552
    Likes:
    689
    good short, easy to understand news clip of judy m explaining how we get xmrv
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2okZgWidVdM&NR=1

    she says we have xmrv, then get a trigger, like infection (me: mono when i was 21) or vaccine, and the t and b cells are hightened, and then, vo-la, we are sick.
     
  2. camas

    camas Senior Member

    Messages:
    697
    Likes:
    227
    Oregon
    Thank for posting this. It's a good clip to forward to family and friends.
     
  3. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,413
    Likes:
    34,775
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    Hi

    It is interesting to note the change in presentation. It leaves less doubt about causation. XRMV is described as a pathogen, which is triggered when T and B cells become activated by infection or vaccination.

    Bye
    Alex
     
  4. Rrrr

    Rrrr Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,552
    Likes:
    689
    well written, alex.
     
  5. Cort

    Cort Phoenix Rising Founder

    When was that made?

    The problem is that the way this news report goes Dr. Mikovits is made to sound like mother to child transmission has already been proven....it may very well be true but that finding is way ahead of the science here - no one has found XMRV in breast milk, no one has shown that mothers can transmit it to the child 0 (its not chewed up in the stomach acids?). There haven't been any papers on this and here this reporter is making her sound like its a fait accompli.

    I don't if that helps her or the WPI. I don't know how much it hurts either...researchers are used to getting things twisted to fit a story.
     
  6. Robyn

    Robyn

    Messages:
    180
    Likes:
    0
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     
  7. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,413
    Likes:
    34,775
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    Hi Cort

    If you listen carefully you hear Judy say it probably is transmitted through breast feeding. She is more than a little careful. She also stops short of saying that XMRV causes CFS or autism, but it is strongly implied. I find the shift in emphasis from "new retrovirus" to "pathogen" very interesting however. What does she know that is not public yet?

    I have not seen any date on this clip. Did anyone else see one?

    Bye
    Alex
     
  8. Cookie Monster

    Cookie Monster

    Messages:
    76
    Likes:
    1
    This clip is very old - was put on Youtube on 30th march but i think it was possibly even made last year around the time that the science article was published
     
  9. CBS

    CBS Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,502
    Likes:
    845
    The anchor is Gulstan Dart (anyone actually think that's his real name?). He works for Sacramento, California's Channel 3 (http://www.kcra.com). There is only one link to a video on CFS listd on the Channel 3 site. That link is dated Oct. 9, 2009. However, the story that is shown when clicking on this link is about a casino opening. Can't find any other videos on the site about CFS but the thumbnail on the Channel 3 site is the picture of XMRV with which the YouTube video ends.
     
  10. Sing

    Sing Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes:
    1,330
    New England
    Frankly speaking, I agree that it is most important for people with ME/CFS to have a very clear idea of what the science has established, what it hasn't and what is somewhere in between.

    However, As for the general public, I think it is necessary to play politics to a degree, to emphasize the most serious facts AND possibilities. This is like blowing air on a fire you are struggling to light after years of no wood or wet wood.

    Some issues in the world are already raging fires, attracting masses of attention and resources. Example: terrorism. Other issues deserve serious attention and resources but don't get it--like ME/CFS. In this case it is politically smart and probably even politically necessary to emphasize not only every fact at your disposal but also to make a compelling story for people to respond to, which connects the dots.

    Dr. Mikovits, in my opinion, does both very well, as both a skilled scientific researcher and as a political spokesperson. We need both aspects very much if we are ever to get out of the sidelines and our long standing helplessness.
     
  11. Cort

    Cort Phoenix Rising Founder

    I agree that we desperately need more effective public spokesman - I just don't know if the research world allows its researchers to be those people. Let's put it this way - while some people in the research world are political advocates I think that advocacy may come at a cost at the research end. I think its fine if they stick to the published works - but I worry about speculating in public. I imagine that, over time, that's something that researchers learn never to do given the way the media works.
     
  12. Sing

    Sing Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes:
    1,330
    New England
    Yeah, it might be better having different people in the roles of scientist on the one hand and advocate or political spokesperson on the other.

    When I talked about rallying the public, I was thinking of this as a source of political pressure. The research community bows to political pressures frequently in what it studies, or let's slide or won't study at all.
     
  13. Cort

    Cort Phoenix Rising Founder

    In our position - with a disease that the research community usually ignores I agree that political pressure is crucial! In fact until XMRV showed up I thought it was the only way that we would ever be able to get good funding.

    We just had an XMRV -CFS study funded by the NIH - its an excellent study - I believe studying Dr. Bell's pediatric cohort; hopefully its a harbinger of things to come. Unfortunately WPI has still not received a single grant for XMRV! (and from what I've been told they have tried). Hopefully that will change soon.
     
  14. Robyn

    Robyn

    Messages:
    180
    Likes:
    0
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     
  15. Megan

    Megan Senior Member

    Messages:
    230
    Likes:
    13
    Australia
    I'm sure I have seen this clip too, I think at the time of the announcement last year. I think Judy is being more careful now in saying some of those things so I doubt it is recent.
     
  16. Otis

    Otis Señor Mumbler

    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes:
    116
    USA
    Nope. :) Or if so I wonder why he didn't change it.

    As I recall Judy talked quite a lot about possible methods of transmission very early on after publication, including nursing mothers.

    It might make sense that this was footage gathered right after the Science paper, and that this story, for whatever reason, was put together now. Perhaps to throw something on XMRV out there ahead of the FDA/NIH study results. Either that or someone in the news room bet "Mr. Dart" that he couldn't find an excuse to show - not one but TWO nursing mothers - on the evening news. Perhaps not. :rolleyes:
     
  17. Robyn

    Robyn

    Messages:
    180
    Likes:
    0
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     
  18. Otis

    Otis Señor Mumbler

    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes:
    116
    USA
    Robyn,

    I absolutly agree with the benefits to baby, it doesn't bother me in the least and I didn't mean to offend anyone. I'm sorry if I came as negative to the idea or practice of nursing, definitly not my intent.

    Otis
     
  19. Robyn

    Robyn

    Messages:
    180
    Likes:
    0
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     
  20. jonc

    jonc

    Messages:
    36
    Likes:
    0
    I think the only way that the public is really going to get interested in this topic (and thereby generate political pressure for more research money) is through threats to public health and that means discussion of transmission. Breast-feeding, blood transfusions, sexual transmission and everything else are therefore necessary discussion items to be pushed into the public arena.
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page