1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
Give ME the Money
Graham McPhee spells out some of the cold, hard facts about the dismal state of ME research and politics, and has some suggestions as to what we can do about it ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Good article on how draft for next WHO icd classification does not have ME under nervous system dis.

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS News' started by anniekim, Feb 11, 2014.

  1. anniekim

    anniekim Senior Member

    Messages:
    594
    Likes:
    199
    U.K
    Worrying times. I had heard through the excellent work of Suzy Chapman about the news that in the current draft for the next W.H.O ICD edition ME and CFS are not listed under illnesses of the nervous system as they have always been. However, an entity called bodily distress disorder is under mental health in the new draft and both CFS and ME are listed as illnesses that come under BDS, This is extremely worrying. A good article about it all here http://guardianlv.com/2014/02/fibromyalgia-and-mecfs-labeled-mental-and-behavioral-disorders-by-who/
     
    Antares in NYC and Ember like this.
  2. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,378
    Likes:
    5,873
  3. Antares in NYC

    Antares in NYC Senior Member

    Messages:
    170
    Likes:
    226
    USA
    This is OUTRAGEOUS!
    Now the HHS/IOM charade makes sense, with this as the context.

    What can we do about this?
     
    leela likes this.
  4. Firestormm

    Firestormm Guest

    Messages:
    5,824
    Likes:
    5,982
    Cornwall England
    If anyone ever wants to stay up to date with these developments then there is frankly no one better informed in my view than @Dx Revision Watch and Suzy Chapman.

    You can read the update from her (8 February 2014) here: http://dxrevisionwatch.com/2014/02/...93-3-categories-within-the-icd-11-beta-draft/

    One of our often unsung heroes in my book :)
     
    peggy-sue, Bob, aimossy and 4 others like this.
  5. leela

    leela Slow But Hopeful

    Messages:
    2,457
    Likes:
    3,015
    Couchland, USA
    Holy crap the campaign to ignore the emerging science is really upping the ante!
     
  6. Antares in NYC

    Antares in NYC Senior Member

    Messages:
    170
    Likes:
    226
    USA
    I'm no fan of conspiracy theories, but all the recent events lead me to believe there are people with a committed interest in sweeping ME/CFS under the rug, deny it research, and dismiss the millions of patients as insane. I mean, we even witnessed extremes as petty as having news reports about ME/CFS banned from Facebook!

    Something's up.
     
  7. leela

    leela Slow But Hopeful

    Messages:
    2,457
    Likes:
    3,015
    Couchland, USA
    @Antares in NYC Yes indeedy. No tin foil hats needed, this is happening in a big way.
    Let's hope it's just the last desperate grab of the old guard as it loses its grip.

    Because let us not forget all the amazing people and information "coming out" in an even bigger way now.
    Never before have we had such a whirlwind of high-profile scientists collaborating with each other, collectively petitioning the government, publicly calling BS on the funding, gathering private investors to move research ahead; plus multiple documentary films, several journalists with integrity and heartfelt commitment to solid reporting, a gathering solidarity among patients, ever-increasing evidence for the biomedical basis of the disease, etc.

    There is reason to stand tall in the face of the Shenanigans and see how desperate and pathetic it is.
     
  8. WillowJ

    WillowJ Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,132
    Likes:
    2,809
    WA, USA
    it looks like one can register with the beta draft site and make comments. *EDIT: apparently they want only researchers and healthcare providers*

    I would recommend taking a reasonable, businesslike tone and, when talking about BDD, not focusing solely on ME and fibro and MCS, etc., as this will hurt everyone

    (seriously, anyone with any "extra" or "unexplained" symptoms can get this as an add-on diagnosis and be shuttled to an alternate, do not take seriously, limit testing, limit appointments, track... including MS, Lupus, cancer, rare diseases, etc.; anything that is difficult or may take a little while to diagnose is at particular risk, including most autoimmune and neurological diseases! ).
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2014
    peggy-sue, leela and Antares in NYC like this.
  9. biophile

    biophile Places I'd rather be.

    Messages:
    1,400
    Likes:
    4,864
    Although such vested interests probably do exist, I think ideology and tradition is playing a major role. The history of psychiatry has always been swayed by fads and ideologies. Wider medicine has always had "medically unexplained" physical symptoms, and if you go back far enough there were basically no good explanations for almost any symptom.

    Psychobabbling also has a long history in medicine, at least since Freud's era. Before then, mental illness was commonly seen as a physical thing or a weak constitution, or sometimes spiritual afflictions involving demons etc.

    The growing number of overlapping and vague syndromes, combined with all the other medically unexplained symptoms which are not specific to any syndrome, presents a problem and burden to health care. A generalized psychosomatic functional syndrome such as BDS is very convenient for sweeping up anything which cannot be explained well yet, or is too difficult to explain well, or does not yet have its own well-defined definition. Those judged as mental patients and social deviants alike used to be routinely locked up in institutions without real help because it was very convenient too.

    As alex3619 has mentioned numerous times at this forum, much of the current thinking is simply regurgitated from Freud's era of hysteria. Psychiatry is sort of like the odd cousin or the "Uncle Fester" of the medical family. Yes, it has moved on from Freud's era, but some of the underlying assumptions have remained without adequate scrutiny.
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2014
    peggy-sue, SOC, Cheshire and 3 others like this.
  10. leela

    leela Slow But Hopeful

    Messages:
    2,457
    Likes:
    3,015
    Couchland, USA
    Uncle Fester! omg, @biophile! perfect!
     
    peggy-sue and biophile like this.
  11. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,678
    Likes:
    12,472
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    But without Uncle Fester's redeeming features.

    I think Dx Revision watch is in a holding pattern? I read that reporting will not continue, but I do not know the details.

    These are what we do know: http://dxrevisionwatch.com/2014/02/11/final-post-on-dx-revision-watch/

    BDD (Bodily Distress Disorder) is part of what we are fighting, and were always fighting. Its an example why I am so focused on psychobabble.

    BDD is so broad it catches everything. If you don't know what someone has, it must be BDD! Every misdiagnosis, every too hard case, every rare genetic disorder they do no test for, every atypical presentation of existing disorders ... this is pseudoscience at its most dangerous. Its a reprise as hysteria, now that hysteria has fallen out of favour. Its.like a century long timewarp.
     
    peggy-sue and A.B. like this.
  12. anciendaze

    anciendaze Senior Member

    Messages:
    903
    Likes:
    1,048
    Anyone check on what the draft says about hypokalemic periodic paralysis? There is a doozy of a condition for misdiagnosis. Coupled with the fact that doctors are actively discouraged from running expensive tests on patients with a psych. label this practically guarantees that some people who go to doctors for help with a very real organic condition are going to die in locked psych. wards.
     
    peggy-sue, WillowJ, biophile and 3 others like this.
  13. Purple

    Purple Bundle of purpliness

    Messages:
    1,400
    Likes:
    2,311
    ...every doctor who couldn't be bothered to use or increase their knowledge or act professionally to give a correct diagnosis or who is not allowed by the 'system' to run appropriate tests...
     
    peggy-sue, WillowJ and alex3619 like this.
  14. Dx Revision Watch

    Dx Revision Watch dxrevisionwatch.com

    Messages:
    1,819
    Likes:
    558
    UK
    Please see my comments about this article's title and content on the other thread.
     
    anniekim likes this.
  15. anniekim

    anniekim Senior Member

    Messages:
    594
    Likes:
    199
    U.K
    @Dx Revision Watch Sorry for not making It clear that ME isn't actually listed under bodily distress disorder in the current ICD 11 beta draft, my mistake. Thank you for though highlighting it is not currently under nervous system illnesses either and is currently not anywhere - and for all the great work you have done on this
     
  16. Firestormm

    Firestormm Guest

    Messages:
    5,824
    Likes:
    5,982
    Cornwall England
  17. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,678
    Likes:
    12,472
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    A paper came out just the other day, on BDD, I will see if I can find it. CFS, FM, IBS are all included in the paper.

    PS Doh, paper was from last year. The most recent paper, often cited, that discusses in depth what BDD is meant to be, is about four year old:

    Journal of Psychosomatic Research 68 (2010) 415–426

    One single diagnosis, bodily distress syndrome, succeeded to capture
    10 diagnostic categories of functional somatic syndromes and
    somatoform disorders


    Per Fink, Andreas Schröder

    It is often the case that BDS and BDD are discussed in terms of CFS, FM etc.
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2014
  18. Dx Revision Watch

    Dx Revision Watch dxrevisionwatch.com

    Messages:
    1,819
    Likes:
    558
    UK
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2014
    WillowJ, aimossy, anniekim and 3 others like this.
  19. Dx Revision Watch

    Dx Revision Watch dxrevisionwatch.com

    Messages:
    1,819
    Likes:
    558
    UK
    Alex, when you say a paper on "BDD" are you sure you mean "BDD" as in "Bodily distress disorder" which is the term proposed by the 17 member Expert Working Group on Somatic Distress and Dissociative Disorders (S3DWG) that is one of the groups advising on the revision of ICD-10′s Somatoform Disorders.

    Or do you mean "BDS" which is the already operational definition and criteria as published by Fink et al in 2010?

    With three terms in play: BDD, BSS (Bodily stress disorder) and BDS it is important that the correct term is used.

    If you find the paper please let me have the citation ref.

    Suzy
     
    Firestormm likes this.
  20. Dx Revision Watch

    Dx Revision Watch dxrevisionwatch.com

    Messages:
    1,819
    Likes:
    558
    UK
    More from Twitter:

    WHO ‏@WHO

    @secretspartacus #ICD11 beta draft is a web platform for collaborative editing. It’s not final & not approved by WHO http://goo.gl/5FGiKx

    WHO ‏@WHO

    @secretspartacus Researchers, health-care providers are invited to comment, make proposals to #ICD11 beta draft http://goo.gl/NCkhRS
     
    WillowJ, aimossy and Firestormm like this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page