1. Patients launch a $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
The Lipkin Microbiome Crowdfunding Campaign Launches!
An ambitious $1.27m international, patient-led fundraising campaign storms into action. Sasha invites you to join it!
Discuss the article on the Forums.

(general) Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Dolphin, Aug 2, 2011.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,472
    Likes:
    4,754
    Free full text at: http://www.ajan.com.au/Vol25/Vol_25-4_vandeMortel.pdf

    I thought it was interesting as it:
    (i) gives some examples of the bias
    (ii) shows that some studies actually try to control for it.

    Given the amount of questionnaires that are used in ME/CFS research, this may have some relevance.

  2. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,101
    Likes:
    4,903
    Doesn't Chalder think that CFS patients are particularly prone to distortions driven by consideration of social desirability (underpinning her working linking it to anorexia?)

    I doubt she'd bring it up in this regard.
  3. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,472
    Likes:
    4,754
    Afraid I haven't read that paper so will leave it to others to answer.

    Basically what the authors are referring to is individuals not truthfully answering questionnaires on a wide variety of things, which is a slightly different issue from people feeling some sort of social pressure to act/think/whatever in a certain way but where their answers to questions are what they really think/feel/is really the way they behave.
  4. CBS

    CBS Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,356
    Likes:
    216
    Western US
    SDR is also known as "faking good."

    Well designed questionnaires will have sub-scales built into them that assess SDR.

    In a broader context, the process of properly validating an instrument (such as a set of questions used for a diagnostic criteria for a specific disorder - such as the ICC) is time consuming, expensive and it requires a significant background in the appropriate statistical methods. Look what happened with the Reeves definition, a ten-fold increase in the number of "CFS" patients. I'm hoping that Lenny Jason wasn't a co-author of the ICC because he wanted to independently validate it and not because he didn't feel comfortable with it.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page