Its actually plausible for an antibody test to be positive without exposure. We dont know enough about this group of viruses yet to proclaim anything with 100% certainty. There is a reason why they have these conferences with differing opinions and why science is science. Its also worth re-mentioning that having antibodies is not eqaul to having an active infection either but rather evidence of exposure.
Please let the professionals figure this out without belittling a researcher who seems to be in it to further our knowledge of the illness. From what I know about this particular researcher is that they dont come from the psychobaber club. Nobody is saying you have to agree with her but please respect her voice and appreciate its contribution to the process. Its actually good to have someone constantaly questioning the methods. In the end science is stronger.
Please let the professionals figure this out without belittling a researcher who seems to be in it to further our knowledge of the illness. From what I know about this particular researcher is that they dont come from the psychobaber club. Nobody is saying you have to agree with her but please respect her voice and appreciate its contribution to the process. Its actually good to have someone constantaly questioning the methods. In the end science is stronger.