1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
The Pathway to Prevention (P2P) for ME/CFS: A Dangerous Process
Gabby Klein gives an overview of the P2P process, shedding light on the pitfalls with advice as to what we can do in protest ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

FDA is trying to ban natural Folate?!?!

Discussion in 'Detox: Methylation; B12; Glutathione; Chelation' started by sregan, Aug 13, 2014.

  1. sregan

    sregan Senior Member

    Messages:
    313
    Likes:
    122
    Southeast
    ANH-USA Submits Formal Comments on FDA’s Latest Attempt to Ban the Natural Form of a B Vitamin

    Take Action:
    http://www.anh-usa.org/anh-usa-submits-formal-comments/

    http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_30588.cfm

    Last edited: Aug 13, 2014
    taniaaust1 and ggingues like this.
  2. ahmo

    ahmo Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,057
    Likes:
    635
    Northcoast NSW, Australia
    Oh No, Not AGAIN! [​IMG]
    Little Bluestem likes this.
  3. Hello sregan- Here is a quote from the FDA's food labeling revision letter dated 3-3- 2014.

    They want to "specify that “folic acid” is the term used to declare folic acid content of dietary supplements; and to remove “folate” and “folacin” from the list of synonyms that may be used to declare folic acid on the Supplement Facts label."

    I could be wrong, but it sounds like they are removing the terms folate and folacin as they apply to folic acid only, not food folate or methylfolate.
  4. sregan

    sregan Senior Member

    Messages:
    313
    Likes:
    122
    Southeast
    Jimbo, this comes right from the OCA which is a consumer group I have followed for at least a decade. When they sound the alert I listen. I added my comments using those links. Better safe than sorry.

    http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_29498.cfm
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2014
  5. SREGAN- It was the "109-proposed rule" link on the first page of the link you gave, that I got the quote above. : ) Am I misunderstanding the quote?
  6. Lynn_M

    Lynn_M Senior Member

    Messages:
    131
    Likes:
    38
    Western Nebraska
    I clicked on the link for FDA's 109-page proposed guidance in SREGAN'S original post in this thread: https://www.federalregister.gov/art...-of-the-nutrition-and-supplement-facts-labels. This is the section "2. Folate and Folic Acid" from that document:
    While recognizing the difference in bioavailability between naturally occurring folate and synthetic folic acid, it does sound to me that the only permissible proposed labeling in dietary supplements would be for folic acid. Meaning folate could not be sold as a dietary supplement, IMO, if this guidance is approved.
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2014
    taniaaust1 likes this.
  7. Hi Lynn_M- You are quoting section J. I think this section is why people are confused, it is hard to understand. If you scoll down the page to "Folate and Folic acid" under section L."Dietary supplements" it says- Quote-

    https://www.federalregister.gov/art...-of-the-nutrition-and-supplement-facts-labels

    This seems pretty clear that they are talking about not using the terms "folate" and "folacin" instead of folic acid on supplement labels like they do now. Instead they would have to use the words "folic acid". All the best- Jim
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2014
  8. TigerLilea

    TigerLilea Senior Member

    Messages:
    150
    Likes:
    182
    Vancouver, British Columbia
    Did you actually go to the document and read the proposed changes? I'm pretty sure that the ANH-USA didn't, either.


  9. Hip

    Hip Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,802
    Likes:
    2,566
    What a totally wrong and misleading title. Shame on the Organic Consumers Association.
    Valentijn and Soundthealarm21 like this.
  10. Lynn_M

    Lynn_M Senior Member

    Messages:
    131
    Likes:
    38
    Western Nebraska
    ljimbo423 and Hip,

    I disagree with your interpretations. Section L reads about the same as section J. They're proposing that dietary supplements can only list folic acid in the labeling, not folate or folacin. If the labeling only permits the words folic acid, that seems to me that they are precluding the use of folate in dietary supplements.

    It would be commendable if the FDA was saying that the words folate or folacin can't be used on the label to describe folic acid. But that's not what they are saying. The wording in the guidance is that the only words permitted on dietary supplements are folic acid. In readings sections J and L, they make no exception for the labeling as folate in dietary supplements as folate.

    Last edited: Aug 13, 2014
    celeste likes this.
  11. adreno

    adreno 3% neanderthal

    Messages:
    2,285
    Likes:
    1,418
    Tundras of Europa
    It means that you can't label your folic acid as folate, as they are not the same.
    Helen likes this.
  12. Valentijn

    Valentijn Activity Level: 3

    Messages:
    6,150
    Likes:
    8,613
    Amersfoort, Netherlands
    Folate and folic acid are the same thing, chemically. We just use the different terms to specify if we're talking about the active or inactive from, as a matter of convenience. The supplement industry doesn't observe any such niceties, and something labeled only as "folate" is probably what we would call "folic acid".

    Unless there's some indication that it's active folate, such as by using the full name (levomefolic acid, 5-MTHF, l-methylfoloate, etc), plain "folate" is currently meaningless and deceptive anyhow. I'd have no problem seeing that term go, so long as the other terms describing the active form accurately can remain.
    WillowJ likes this.
  13. sregan

    sregan Senior Member

    Messages:
    313
    Likes:
    122
    Southeast
    For me I don't really care, if there is a chance this may restrict any use of supplements. I've already signed the thing and sent my statement to the FDA. Tryptophan was coincidentally pulled as soon as Prozac hit the market. An active form of B6 has already been restricted (Pyridoxamine ). Statins cannot be sold if they are standardized. You got congressmen like Durbin introducing the same sneaky legislation every year trying to restrict supplements (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/06/19/durbin-supplement-bill.aspx).

    If we don't pay attention we're going to end up like Canada and have to get a prescription for vitamin C! (probably an exaggeration :)
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2014
    ggingues likes this.
  14. PeterPositive

    PeterPositive Senior Member

    Messages:
    466
    Likes:
    169
    That's true but to make a proper distinction we should call the synthetic folate, often referred to as "folic acid", with one of its technical names such as pteroyl-L-glutamic acid, which sucks :)

    Probably it would be best if the labeling was more precise and indicated the form of folic acid all the times. At least it would put an end to this confusion.
    WillowJ and Valentijn like this.
  15. Hip

    Hip Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,802
    Likes:
    2,566
    The difference between folic acid and folate is that the former is an acid, and the latter part of an acid salt. This is standard chemical terminology for acids and their salts.

    An acid salt is formed when an acid combines with a metal such as sodium, potassium, calcium or magnesium, or with non-metals such as ammonium.

    For example, vitamin C can come as an acid (ascorbic acid), or in acid salt form (ascorbate). There are various different vitamin C acid salts, including sodium ascorbate, potassium ascorbate and magnesium ascorbate.


    Other examples of acids and their salts include:

    Malic acid, and malate (eg: magnesium malate)
    Citric acid, and citrate (eg: sodium citrate)
    Sulfuric acid, and sulfate (eg: magnesium sulfate, aka: Epsom salts)


    All the FDA are doing is stipulating that the correct labeling is used, so that people know whether a product contains folic acid, or a folate.

    You'd think that the Organic Consumers Association would actually know a little bit about chemistry, but it appears they have no training in that area.
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2014
  16. Snowdrop

    Snowdrop Senior Member

    Messages:
    422
    Likes:
    602
    Toronto
    While there are plenty of restricted substances here in Canada vitamin C isn't one of them.
  17. Freddd

    Freddd Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,538
    Likes:
    892
    Salt Lake City
    I want to mention how some of the restrictions of Canadian supplements. The one I know best is carnitine because I read everything to do with it at the time. The restriction came about because of one person's report of "terrible" side effects. The person was taking a lot of meds including Klonopin. Their overall profile would look very similar to many of ours here. The person had a hyper response of what looks like a damaged limbic system to carnitine. I could see MeCbl being banned there because somebody reports overwhelming side effects like hypokalemia and donut hole paradoxical folate deficiency only they don't call them that. I would say that one needs to understand the nature of the "side effects" to know what is going on.

    The misuse of "folate" to disguise the presence of folic acid is dangerous to a lot of us. Forcing the supplement makers to explicitly label folic acid is a good thing. They know quite well that "folic acid" is something millions of people are now avoiding. It is easier and cheaper to change the labeling to "folate", "calcium folate" and so on and remove those poison words "folic acid" than it is to change to l-methylfolate.

    Folic acid has been a disaster for millions of us. For millions of us it may be an originating cause for CFS/FMS and related diseases.
  18. TigerLilea

    TigerLilea Senior Member

    Messages:
    150
    Likes:
    182
    Vancouver, British Columbia
    They are saying that food products can no longer list folic acid as an ingredient. The term folic acid can only be used for supplements. However, it does not say anywhere that folate cannot be listed as an ingredient in supplements.
  19. Leopardtail

    Leopardtail Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,011
    Likes:
    606
    England
    I can't work out whether this applies only to mislabelling of folic acid as folate, or a general ban.
  20. Lynn_M

    Lynn_M Senior Member

    Messages:
    131
    Likes:
    38
    Western Nebraska
    .

    Does this say that the only allowable place for the term "folic acid" is in dietary supplement labeling? Or is it saying that dietary supplement labels are restricted to saying "folic acid". Where do 5-MTHF and l-folate fit in? Are they still permitted or not?

    I think there is a lot of ambiguity here.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page