1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
Can You Come for a Visit? My ME/CFS Says No
My daughter and son-in-law just had a baby last week. We are thrilled. But we won't be able to see the baby or hold her any time soon. We won't be able to take over little gifts or help out with housework or babysitting.
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Establishing research cohorts of 'Canadian' criteria patients: an urgent need

Discussion in 'Action Alerts and Advocacy' started by Angela Kennedy, Feb 21, 2010.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,591
    Likes:
    5,201
    Thanks for the tip. I am interested in it but have so far been put off by the length (and have been doing other things).
  2. Gerwyn

    Gerwyn Guest

    They are only going to use Oxford and not Feduka at all .fine print I,m sure that one of the tests was parametric .spot on on bias.
  3. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,591
    Likes:
    5,201
    Completion of baseline assessment
    The following baseline assessments will be completed at visit 2:

    [..]

    2. The CDC criteria for CFS [1]
  4. Gerwyn

    Gerwyn Guest

    At the bottom of the methodology section they clearly state that the weeded out patients will fit the oxford criterea
  5. Gerwyn

    Gerwyn Guest

    Sorry Tomk This is what is getting me hot under the collar.In 25 years it is the worst study I,ve ever seen. Not ONE criterea for an RCT has been met! They can even adjust a patients self reports to adjust for" completeness "according to predetermined criterea.You cant even tell whether ant treatment is better than a cup of tea and a chat - oh and by the way patients have been allocated into groups based on the severity of their DEPRESSION Let me guess the milder depressed ones got CBT and or standard treatment and the pacing group were so depressed that they could barely cross a room!
    nclusion criteria

    1. Both participant and clinician agree that randomisation is acceptable.

    2. The participant has given written informed consent.

    3. The participant meets operationalised Oxford research diagnostic criteria for CFS [2].

    4. The participant's Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire score is 6 or more [27].

    5. The participant's SF-36 physical function sub-scale score [28] is 65 or less.

    6. The participant is aged at least 18 years old.
    Exclusion criteria

    1. All potential participants will be screened for medical exclusions, by history and physical examination [1,2,4,29]. Appropriate investigations [4,29] will be undertaken by either the referring doctor or the centre doctors (checked by the research nurse) in the six months before baseline screening. Patients with a relevant alternative medical diagnosis will be excluded [2]. Investigations will be those recommended by the Royal Colleges' Report on CFS/ME and the CMO's working group report [4,29].

    2. The research nurse (RN) will use a standardised psychiatric interview (the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV – SCID) [30], under supervision by a participating centre PI or nominated deputy, to exclude those who are at significant risk of self-harm and those with psychiatric exclusions listed in the Oxford diagnostic criteria for CFS [2].

    3. Patients who are considered by the RN, in discussion with their centre leader, to be unable to do one or more of the trial therapies or to complete all trial measures or for whom participation in the PACE trial would be inappropriate to their clinical needs (e.g. someone with significant post-traumatic stress disorder or borderline personality disorder).

    4. Patients who have previously attended a PACE centre specialist fatigue clinic and received a course of treatment, from a specialist, considered to be similar to SSMC or any of the supplementary therapies of APT, CBT, or GET as delivered in the trial will be excluded from taking part in the trial.
    Screening/Baseline Procedures
  6. starryeyes

    starryeyes Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes:
    4
    Bay Area, California
    Thanks for answering my questions. :) It's inspiring to see all the well-researched comments you all are making on these studies.
  7. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,591
    Likes:
    5,201
    Thanks very much teejkay. :Retro smile:
  8. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,591
    Likes:
    5,201
    Yes, that is right (all will satisfy the Oxford criteria) but they will note who satisfy the Fukuda definition (but not note who satisfies the Canadian criteria) which I believe is what Angela was alluding to.
  9. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,591
    Likes:
    5,201
    Are you sure? What explicitly are you saying? I imagine they see the SSMC as the control group. And they do seem to do some sort of randomisation.

    My guess is that in terms of the points system for trials, it will has been designed to do well.

    This is the only reference to "completeness" I can find.

    What are you saying is bad about this (i.e. quote about this line)?

    They claim that people will be divided up in equal amounts. Although not everyone might trust them.

  10. Gerwyn

    Gerwyn Guest

    There is no such thing as standard therapy it is just a term they have coined.you can see that complete has two meanings here they are free to amend the forms since when has this being science.The final inclusion criterea are those that conform to oxford only only the prelim is "CDC".If you look you will see that pts were stratified according to severity of depression-patients with depression should be actively excluded! how can you allocate patients to a study with the label CDC criterea of unmet you can alter a patients self report according to PREDETERMINED criterea. a RCT uses the Null hypothesis does not go looking to get support for theories uses objective measureable end points internationally agreed diagnostic criterea and is blinded and the measurements once made cannot be unblinded.Every thing is a subjective interpretation.
  11. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,591
    Likes:
    5,201
    I am not sure what you are saying? My impresion is that all will satisfy the Oxford criteria but they will note who satisfy the Fukuda definition (but not note who satisfies the Canadian criteria) - are you saying that is wrong? I suppose one aspect is that excludes Fukuda-but-not-Oxford patients - but is that many? I'm not sure how they do the exclusions e.g. is a positive Romberg sign an exclusion from Oxford? Reeves actually uses it as an exclusion from the CDC research (even before the empiric definition).

    Some of this depression won't be particularly serious
    They might argue that, like with conditions like MS, some of the people with "CFS" will also have some form of depression in a real practice. Although given the possible lack of certainty as to the correct diagnosis of some people, it might be better to try to have a pure sample.
    My fear is we may be selectively be given figures which suggest the depression issue isn't an issue as there will be so many figures they could give but they can choose what they want to show us.

    Also it is interesting that they tend to exclude people from CFS research if you have another physical condition, but not if you have some psychiatric conditions.

    Yes, I agree, like previous studies you really have to wonder what a lot of these Oxford-criteria-but-not-Fukuda-criteria patients have. But again, I worry they will twist the figures and claim the results are the same for all groups and so we they will claim we shouldn't criticise the earlier studies which used the Oxford criteria.
    Also, not sure if you know but initially the FINE Trial was just going to be on the Fukuda criteria. Then quite late in the day, it was altered to match the PACE Trial in a few ways e.g. it uses the Oxford criteria as the main criteria but will check for the Fukuda criteria.

    I agree.
  12. Gerwyn

    Gerwyn Guest

    minor depression would be serious to you and me --these guys are clever with wording that is not english but has a very precise meaning in psycho land.Major depression as a comorbidity is ex rare.Oxford is final inclusion criterea ones who dont fit are weeded out..Thanks about FINE very interesting.I really appreciate your input I will get back to you regarding other points got to take kids to school

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page