aaron_c
Senior Member
- Messages
- 691
Wowwww look what I found!
This reminds me of something Harry Potter's Rita Skeeter would write. Cheerful, informative, yet unreasonably nasty and containing only enough truth to make it believable to the uninformed.
Granted, the author probably just read the book and wrote the report. So the article, at least, is probably not as malicious as I might have just suggested.
people literally thought that AIDS wasn't caused by a virus, but by cultural shame.
Still exists. Still gets published.
Seeing as how they are labeling the Human Immunodeficiency Virus as psychosomatic, perhaps in their minds psychosomatic simply denotes a disease whose symptoms can be effected to some degree by psychology (so...nearly every disease).
Obviously, the proponents of the broader psychosomatic view (assuming they exist) have no idea the harm they do by conflating the two definitions. To nearly everyone, physicians included, psychosomatic means "it's all in your head."
Maybe the authors of the articles you point to are really so nearsighted as to believe that HIV is entirely a psychological disease. But I have to wonder if there isn't an explanation requiring slightly less obtusity on their parts.